Fascinating. I actually did my degree in archaeology as a science and I'm sad to confirm (whether people believe me or not) that the true history is not what we are taught in school or shown in film. I've seen contradictory archaeological evidence be destroyed rather than examined as it would upset the mainstream narrative of history.
You mentioned global flood events which mainstream science has continually dismissed as not having occurred stating that there is no evidence for one ever having existed however these scientists are relying on two or three points.
1)The public don't understand the process of fossilisation which requires the organic material to have been encased in wet sediment soon after death and meaning that most fossils were formed because the creature either drowned or died just before a major flood event.
If you take dinosaurs for example and just consider the fact that what the average person seems to believe is that dinosaurs dropped down dead and lay in situ undisturbed long enough to be fossilised to the point where skin or feather impressions are visible. This isn't possible. It ignores natural decomposition, predation and scavenging.
2)Whilst most people claim to be sceptics they believe what scientist tell them without the same proof they demand from the average religious person. Why? Scientists have their own human agenda just like anyone. What I find amazing is that the very same money and power hungry people who were drawn to religious orders in the past are the ones drawn to science now, because religion is actually the precursor of science. In ancient civilisations reading and writing was a very specialised skill which only priests had and that's actually where medicine originated with the shaman, then priest, then scientist. There's no difference.
You also mentioned the wheel within a wheel and how an Bronze or Iron Age person might describe a spacecraft in this manner. (Ezekiel 1:16 KJV)
The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the colour of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.
I agree and I think that the bible has further proof of advanced technology, more people would see this I think if they stopped dismissing all religion out of hand as belief in the "supernatural" which they take to mean "magic" but in fact simply means "beyond nature" or rather our limited understanding of such. For example Exodus 19:16-25 where it talks about God descending on Mount Sinai seems like some sort of advanced craft or technology.
In fact much of Exodus with the burning bush or the pillar of cloud/fire which lead the Israelites through the desert, why couldn't this simply be holographic technology? If you lived in the Bronze Age wouldn't the iPhone seem supernatural to us? Even the parting of the red sea points to advanced technology.
Lastly consider the virgin birth of Jesus and the fact that humans can already recreate that "miracle" using IVF. I think that what Neil Armstrong was talking about as truth's protective layers was actually how closed minded and unimaginative the average person seems to be. They're fed an idea and they just run with it, never taking the time to investigate or consider for themselves.
Excellent response! Thank you for that.
I am at a loss for why the pictures I uploaded to accompany this article are not viewable... Were they viewable when you read the article? As I am new to this site, I admit it could be user error, but also, I know that in discussing controversial topics, many efforts to sensor this secret space program information have been done on other formats. I have personally experienced such.
I agree with everything you said, and think oft about how if we as modern humans travelled simply one hundred years to our past with LED lights, holograms, and devices operated by microchips, how the society, if superstitious in nature, could likely be persuaded to worship us as gods of some kind. This certainly would be true of a civilization operating on a hunter/gatherer barter society.
Yes, your pictures were view-able when I first read your article and I can see them now. I didn't realise that there was a problem with them. Perhaps if you can't see them yourself the issue is with your browser. I'm using Chrome if that is of any help.
You're right about people 100 years ago and how they might view our technology. If you look at science fiction from the early 1900s you can see that it really isn't that far off of what we can do now. Even certain aspects of science fiction from as late as the 1960s with Star Trek has already become scientific fact in terms of our handheld communication devices which are also powerful computers. Even genetic modification which they mentioned when they talked about the eugenic wars isn't too far wrong in terms of the ability of scientist now.
As to a hunter-gatherer society worshipping or fearing us, you're completely correct. As you know, if we look at anthropological studies of recent hunger-gatherer groups (not that there are any who remain unmolested) or just less technologically advanced people still living today, we can therefore get a sort of idea how people who lived thousands of years ago might have seen us if we had turned up. It's not outside of the realm of possibility to believe that ancient cultures were in fact describing aliens in their limited way when they described their gods.