DO YOU SPEND MONEY ON A HOME, TO LET SOMEONE ELSE LIVE IN IT WHILE YOU LIVE IN SOME SHITTY ASS APARTMENT?
NO.
DID YOU BUY A CAR, AND LET SOMEONE ELSE DRIVE IT WHILE YOU RIDE YOUR BIKE?
NO.
SO TELL ME, ALL OF YOU STEEM GENIUSES, WHY THE FUCK WOULD ANYONE BUY STEEM TO REWARD EVERYONE BUT THEMSELVES?
THEY DONT!
DO YOU REALLY THINK THERE ARE THAT MANY GENEROUS PEOPLE IN THE CRYPTO WORLD THAT ARE GOING TO SPEND THEIR HARD EARNED MONEY TO REWARD YOU FOR YOUR SHITTY WRITING AND TAKING A FUCKING WALK WITH ACTISHIT?
THERE AREN'T!
THEY WANT TO EARN BASED ON THEIR STAKE AND REWARD THEMSELVES.
IF YOU WANT BIGGER REWARDS, BUY MORE FUCKING STEEM, POWER UP AND VOTE ON YOURSELF!!!
IF YOU WANT BIGGER REWARDS, BUY MORE FUCKING STEEM, POWER UP AND VOTE ON YOURSELF!!!
Then delegate to sfr u mofo
Posted using Partiko Android
More like "youracryptroprick!" I see how you are!
From your pal @themarkymark-bot! Gone!
i forget to vote on my own comments
hahaha
Exactly! I could not think of a better demand driver for steem. The only reason it isn't working better than it is is because most people outside of this little box don't know about it.
The changes they are making is going to decrease demand for SP, not increase it.
It certainly wasn't the allure of investing money in order to reward others. By the way, Steemit is not censorship resistant, ask @theshadowbrokers.
If there was a desire to publish on here, people would flock to here regardless of the price. That has proven not to be the case.
First of all I never said steemit was steem, you were talking about publishing on a platform, that platform being steemit.
And no, this is not the most used or active blockchain, it's not even in the top 5 depending on the day you look:
https://blocktivity.info/
What drove people to join? Um the prices shooting up from $.07 to $2.83 in the spring of 2017.
The proof is in the activity levels man, c'mon:
That chart is a weekly chart of posts and comments, and it almost perfectly mirrors the price of steem chart.
It clearly shows there is a correlation between the price of steem and activity levels.
SMH
If what you say is true the users and activity on here would continue to go up and up regardless of what the price of steem does. Looking at those numbers overlayed on a price of steem chart doesn't support your thesis.
Curious what your take is on curation snipers.
Posted using Partiko Android
Almost but not sure what you mean by fellow low sp accounts. They often target popular accounts known to receive high payouts with a nominal vote and are more or less agnostic to the content itself.
It's going to be much more profitable post fork I imagine. I see it as undermining ideal functioning of content discovery via organic curation.
Posted using Partiko Android
I'm my third highest supporter of my work. I self vote. So what. Any vote under a 50/50 model is half self vote. Many who you call whiners often don't understand this economy we've created here.
I don't think people are complaining too much about self votes. I think many disagree with the effort that goes in to what some with a lot of SP will self vote, 10 times per day. I think if they were acting more responsibly, there would be less of a problem. Especially when many of them have the most to lose. I realize they will blame the code but that's much like saying they only shoot themselves in the foot because the gun has a trigger.
I don't normally self vote my own comments but I thought it would be funny today.
I do realize purchasing Steem to self vote is one way to make this place appealing to an investor, but the main problem with that is the fact there are far more people on this planet who are not investors, those people have more money, and it's better for business to appeal to them.
The true investor here should be able to see the potential, and the smart ones would see that potential being flushed down the toilet by those acting in ways that diminish the true potential, so they will not invest. The true investor should be able to invest and see a profit, while everyone else does the work; rather than shitposting 10 times per day to a nonexistent audience.
It's easy to purchase Steem and self vote low effort garbage nobody cares about. What that behavior fails to do is provide an incentive for consumers to purchase Steem so they too can benefit by the simple act of consuming content. Nobody is interested in a one liner post about how that smart investor likes toilet paper. Millions of people would be interested in never throwing their money away again in order to be entertained.
It's not impossible for established content producers to ask 10000 people for donations. They do it all the time. If they were wise to the business model this platform can provide, that content producer could easily encourage 10000 people to pull 2.5 million Steem from the market and lock it in as SP. The consumer already spends the money. Steem can offer them a better deal. That content producer would be able to carry on doing well on this platform, without the need or desire to earn existing votes from SP holders already here. That content producer will not want to show up though if the platform isn't acting professionally.
If the groundwork was set and people actually wanted to make money here, it's not impossible to have something like potentially 1 million coming into the platform with potentially quarter million flowing out because of that million. If anyone wants to make money, you need that surplus.
The business model here is quite simple. A teenager working in a fast food restaurant should be able to pick up enough of the business basics to know the establishment cannot make money if the owner purchases a franchise, makes all the burgers, buys all the burgers, and ensures the tables remain empty.
Why that basic business sense floats over so many investor heads around here has always baffled me.
It's because most investors think short term and not long term, especially most professional ones.
It's about quarterly, maximum yearly profit margins.
And that only works for this economy if it's only a small part of what's happening. The place needs thousands of workers, and millions upon millions of consumers who already spend the money in the same fashion, we just need that money here instead of where they throw it away.
Let's be honest, it's all a question of manipulation (marketing) and hype (FOMO).
If some random celebs sign up here to be rewarded by their followers you'd see some decent money flow coming in and then other people joining in causing a chain reaction -> causing a very nice situation for us.
The #1 Steem needs right now is decent marketing and that not only from the content provider side but also from the DApp platform side.
Marketing to the consumer.
In the OP he's talking about what the crypto crowd would do. That's such a small market that they don't really matter and appealing to them would be shooting far too low.
I don't know if you read this post but I suggest you do, mainly so I don't have to repeat myself so much.
The question is always ''why would someone purchase steem to reward people" and I've answered countless times, many different ways.
I had said many times at different places already as well. Why do we need whales to enter, for the health of the platform, ten thousand people purchasing 1000 steem would be much better.
The problem I still see is that the entry barrier to crypto for normal people is relatively high still.
Millions of people are always willing to spend less.
You're right about the entry but at one point in Canada I could go to a retailer and purchase STEEM. I'm not sure if that still exists and I can't remember the name of the company providing the service.
So before marketing I'd want to make purchasing easier. Then go nuts. The entertainment industry business model is where it's at for the simple fact the people already spend the money... and I'll just keep yelling at the clouds and sounding like a fool until I get my way.. LOL!
So... don’t pursue writing? Haha
Any topics you suggest posting about? What do you think contributes the most value?
Also, you can self vote? I mean I saw the arrows, just didn’t think it would do anything. Is self voting ok? Or should I not do it?
Still new here. Lol
STFU! I'll be looking for you, thank you please! #idiotsaskingidiots! you're done!
Whoa... what’s that for? What’s with the aggression? I was asking a simple question man.
Posted using Partiko iOS
IDK - Whatever you were being a cheerleader!
Anybody talking to that trash gets one! Wake up or step off!
Anyone asking me why also will get more!
If you have to ask @berniesanders for advice you deserve way u get!
Also asking him is self voting is ok is frowned upon!
I been here for a long time, I should know!
I'm going to go take a good hard @lookplz on your blog now! K Thanks!
I can’t talk to certain people or I get flagged? What? Is that how you see things. I’m simply asking questions. I’m new here. I ask everyone questions. Is that a bad thing? Should I be punished for being curious? What the hell man?
Posted using Partiko iOS
Not in my world!
Step off it!
You got a complaint, go tell steemit to change the system.
This is totally legal, free, and up to me!
This is STEEM!
Get used to it!
Go take a look at my blog before you ask questions
you have not the slightest idea about
It is like sticking your head
in a bears den!
OMG! Get real! DD!
I'm 100% serious!
I don't fuck around!
Your the one
that is supposed to look around!
Look before you leap!
What's your problem?
Again?...
Please Come back 4 More!
LOL
K!
!
So this is your world now? Is anyone seeing this? Am I going to be getting flags for asking questions now? Can anyone help? I don’t have the power to match this guy and his other accounts.
Posted using Partiko iOS
I didn't self vote for a long time but now I think a self vote on each of my posts is a worthwhile investment considering the time that goes into most of them . I hear what you are saying but excessive selfvotesis is probably not the answer either. "Everything in moderation' as my mother would say.
Posted using Partiko Android
curation rewards should be 75% and author 25%. So its not the best to power down and sell. More profit is for an author to stack and reward own follwers and community to get vots back ( because he gets 75% back and reward others.
The system needs to build the most profitable way = the way supports the system.
Now it isnt.
I tell this since years, i would buy way more steem if this fixed.
If you want people to not self vote, it should probably be more like 90%/10%... but 75%/25% is a good start. 50% is not enough.
I had a dream about @ned the other night. He was actually pretty cool but then CoinMarketCap from March 2020 popped up and STEEM was #378 and I screamed and started laying down hay makers into my pillow and woke up in a cold sweat. 😬
Posted using Partiko Android
Feelsbadman
Posted using Partiko Android
Where is @ned?! Has he abandoned steem?! He hasn't steemed for 3 month!!!!
Posted using Partiko Android
He is in hiding and collecting more money from the programmatic selling of STEEM. We probably won't see him again.
Posted using Partiko Android
I'm not much of a self voter.. but I'm quick to delegate for a decent upvote..
Just listen to this man.
He knows what's up !
You tell the truth and is a strong fact!
Cant be more true
Nice to see how the conversation has totally moved forward and lots of progress made in the...3+ months i've been absent
Self voting on STEEM is no more an issue than mining is to bitcoin. Value is not built and lost from this, but rather from use cases to the blockchain. If the value is going down its because people don't see a reason for it to have value, not because people are voting themselves.
You'd think people would have figured out how markets work by now and where value comes from.
The coming hardfork shows they have not. This hardfork is going to create less demand for SP, not more.
I don't think any change to the economics of steem distribution will have that much of an effect in a positive or negative way on the demand for SP.
The only way to further increase the demand for SP (IMO) is to build out a much more mature and investment worthy ecosystem which surrounds STEEM. There are a variety of projects who are attempting to do that, however it remains to be seen if they will be successful or not.
The only comfort one can take is that the crypto space for as "fast" as it moves. Has proven to actually move at a snails pace when it comes to overall adoption.
At this current stage, I do not see too many reasons to buy steem. The coming HF won't change that, but it also won't really make it any worse overall (IMO of course).
I could go along with that overall.
More specifically though, I think if they really wanted to address "the self voting problem" they needed to go something like 90/10% split for curation/author rewards. Something to incentivize people to not self vote. Policing them with downvotes will cause more damage than good.
I mean the only reason people buy steem right now is to get their ROI via self votes etc, they will be removing this demand driver with the coming hard fork.
Something that might help would be changing the 3 month window to like a 2 week power down window, that might help some in regards to SP demand as well.
With the option of an immediate power down costing 5% of your stake or something like that...
No hedge fund can currently hold SP because they cannot get out in a market crash...
Self voting is less profitable than vote selling though (and a lot more work!).
This is actually a really interesting thought. Immediate powerdown for a price where the lost steem are send to null. Even if the loss was set to 0.5% the idea is kinda brilliant (it would result in a downward pressure on the steem "float" and definitely encourage outside investment and large powerups).
People buy stocks because they can sell them quickly. The 13 week vesting period for holding SP makes it a poor choice for someone who wants to have even moderate liquidity to their capital. If people were locked into a company for 13 weeks after purchasing a security... the stock markets of the world would go nowhere.
Correct.
Regarding vote selling being more profitable than self voting, how do you figure? You can capture 100% of your 10 votes each day by self voting... I haven't seen any vote selling service that gets you above 100% of your 10 votes each day?
I was under the impression that with curation rewards total returns exceed self voting. Perhaps I am wrong.
IF YOU OWN A BUSINESS DO YOU TAKE ALL THE MONEY YOU EARN EVERY DAY AND SPEND IT ON SHIT? IF YOU WOULD DO THAT, HOW LONG WOULD YOUR BUSINESS LAST?
OBLIGATORY FOR THE ALL CAPS.
i don't know either but when everybody is yelling you have to yell to
I kinda like that one!
@berniesanders,
Hat off for what you said! Honestly most of people have no guts to say this!
@coininstant,
Bro please don't get misunderstand what I said here! Most of people has no gut to say this, but bernie has!
Cheers~
Hua, self voting is selfish, and he does it abusively? Oh well you are my friend you get a pass and can say whatever you want! His post seemed to me more like throwing sand in our eyes, or salt in our wounds! Now I'm going to have to go back and read it carefully - just in case I missed something.
@coininstant,
yeah some how self voting is an abuse, but if you share 8:2 ratio (10 upvotes per day - 8 self and 2 out) I think it's a fair deal! By the way, this is our own investment. So, personally I believe it's no harm the invested person utilize it either way!
Cheers~
We'll I only self vote initially to un-grey my post for the first few minutes or so, or as long as it will last. Then I undo and recycle my votes. My self votes are mainly just temporary, unlessI forget undo them since all my rewards are stripped anyway, my self vote just works against the down-voters. I've gotten used to it, I actually enjoy the downvotes, they don't bother me one bit! I love down voting people too!
I love being downvoted now that I come to think about it. If they stopped doing it to me, then I couldn’t do it back, where would my fun be?
It is my blessing and my curse, I’m just rolling with the punches now! lol
“Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's needs, but not every man's greed.”
― Mahatma Gandhi
Congratulations @berniesanders! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPVote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
You are correct. But after HF21, rewards will increase for investment people. They will get 50% of upvote without doing self vote. If we decrease it by 10% less pool then it will be approx. 40% from existing curator reward of upto 25%.
50% is only when nobody else upvotes a post. Otherwise (upto) of the whole rewards are shared with all curators for that post, based on their upvote time and actively managed stake.
Yes, true but you will get your 50% share after the HF21. and this will be better than HF20.
That's not how curation works.
50% of the rewards will be shared AMONG ALL curators. You do not get 50% of your upvote. The curation will still be distributed with all curators.
There will still be frontrunners who will now get a much larger part of curation rewards due to 50% rather than 25%. You can totally expect that there will be automated front-running accounts who will vote at 36 seconds (the 12th/13th block after post publishing). And their earned curation share, compared to now, will be much larger.
If you're the largest whale and upvote a relatively popular post rather late... You will still be the loser and you may end up with only 5-10% of the curation rewards on that post. Which may be much less than 50% of your own vote value.
I agree with this phenomena. but after HF21, this will be not the case as i think. Is it also in HF21 ?
In HF20, if you upvote wisely you will get approx. 100% return by your above current/detail calculation. But this will be not the case in HF21, as i think.
No. He is talking about post hardfork. People self voting get 100% of their votes each day, if they are forced to curate, the will get 50% of their votes each day, if they are good curators that is. This will not create more demand for SP, instead it will create less.
Even more so with the 1 minute window. The switch to 50% will make smaller stakeholders earn more because they can automate, where actually manually curating orcas and whales will be the ones subsidizing the increased curation rewards of early voters. Anyone minnow could easily sacrifice their $0.02 and upvote after 6 seconds in order to maximize their return. Upvote Acid and Bernie as soon as your script allows and you're golden.
By trying to fight "abuse", the behavior of few, each new proposal (and HF) is actually penalizing investors because the focus is constantly on Minimizing abuse. Which, as per white paper, can not be annihilated. The focus should be on actually improving returns also for larger stakeholders. That will increase demand, not a model in which the HODLers subsidize even more.
We know the Austrian model is not what drives Steem anymore. Returns are, not idealism and ideology.
Ok
Posted using Partiko Android
I think this is the only way to get more steem
Do you believe steem might be priced at 0,01 cents in the future because of that ?
Posted using Partiko iOS
Let’s hope it goes lower than that. It ain’t worth s whole lot more.
Tangible metals are a much better place for me to park and forget some fiat dollars.
STEEM looks like a good bet for the "hopers" among us here.
I agree,but not all people are like that,i know some people here on steem investing their money to power up and give their upvote for free to some authors on steem..
like @nathanmars he always give upvote for free,@steempyt upvoting authors for free..
Self upvote is not bad because they invest and use their own money to make money,it is for them if they want to give free upvotes to others and not only for their selves.
more power and God Bless!
Lol all I'm getting from this post is buy more steem which I can't argue with, if you're selling your steem i don't see why you even bother complaining since all you're doing is giving your steem to those who want it and they get even more say and rewards!
I agree with you. No business is successful because it is giving things free. Apple is here because they were hungry for profit, it they had to just donate they'd end up being a junk. People think they should get everything for free in this world without working for it. Nonsensical attitudes.
Amen.
You think @ned and @dantheman left because they thought Steem was going to be too successful?
Nope, they realized they made a grave mistake.
I'll compliment them for creating steem. But.....! Compulsory vote someone else culture will or might not let steem even be par with shitcoin XRP. In a Decentralized platform you have your right of way and no once should tell you what to do.
We need such mentality.
Boom! lol right on! I use to not upvote myself because it was "Taboo" But now heck yeah I do! Awesome analogies by the way.
Posted using Partiko Android
You received a 10.00% complementary upvote from @swiftcash 🤑
To stop similar upvotes from @swiftcash, reply
STOP.Everyone here upvotes themselves with secret alt accounts bernie just doesn't hide it
And so what are you trying to condone that? Anyone trying to defend this little creep will get the full wrath of me! Sounds like you retrying to humorist things!? So he doesn't hide it , is that support to make him a cheerio? Flags A coming for you soon! I'll take my sweet old time getting to Ya though!
Flagging my throw away account, good job retard
Throw away, but not anonymous.
@.........e amirite?
Talking to my throwaway accounts too, good job! Anyone who has to throwaway a retard quip in at the end is one too, lol more coming for you then @madalchemesr! lol what’s your real account so I can get that one too with mine?
This first time someone has spoken bluntly against self righteous people who thinks giving for free is primary duty of investors. I loved it the way you said it.
And investors also upvote if something interesting comes their way but they should not be expected that compulsorily they will vote others than themselves.
Watch U talking about?
You are talking to the guy who complains about weak hands selling, but runs a shit bot that upvotes indiscriminately for those weak hands.
Then, he does some cognitive dissonance dance and says
but my bot doesn't sell. Right...because all the delegators and vote buyers just hold their bags.https://steempeak.com/@prameshtyagi/puc3fi
I'll whine all the way home! This little piggy!
LAME!
FUCK YOU
FUCK KIKES, AND YOUR KIKE BOTS. FUCK THIS SHITHOLE STEEMIT. FUCK YOU @berniesanders.
Be greedy and see how far it gets ya in the end! lol Not far enough to get away from my clutches! You'll see my friend! Just keep spouting lies!
the principle of steemit seems to be lost on you, the point being that people invest because they are seeking quality content. of course they want their own success, but their success comes when others succeed as well, as quality content grows here there is more reason for others to be here and want to join.
of course people don't want to be here because of folks like you, that just create problems.. and literally steal and abuse your power with the use of your bots. you literally chase away quality content creators that bring voices that you don't approve of the message they bring.
of course it begs the question.. why are you even here? if not just to destroy it...
but why?
cabal doesn't like things it can't control, the blockchain leaves a trail that can't be hidden easily.. censorship is nearly impossible.. you can shade visibility but it can't be removed.
if everyone acts like you, there would be no steemit.
you are extremely selfish, and think everyone else is like you (or are promoting the idea, as it seems more appropriate to say.. because i don't believe you are a real person.. who the fuck has as much money and time as you to waste here just bitching?)
and what are you seeking? to destroy the very thing that you are rich on..
it makes no sense.
Consider your account dead.
Do not come back.
You should just power down while you still have "da chance"! lol chumpo! chimpo!
---de@coininstant
I told ya a long time ago dog, you making a big mistake coming after me with your thugs, gouls, ghosts, and gangsats'! Now you will be paying me for the rest of eternity! You fucked with the one wrong dude! The only one!
Why so glum chum??? #chasif!
hahaha, sorry for the spam u say,
why u say dat? are steemit or something?
only going to get worse for ya! I assure you, you’ve made me invincible! don't you get it yet, stupid moron! they are starting to see they’re starting to open up their eyes and side with me now! whyhahahhjah!
wat is dat a threat!??? lol
now u mad, u made me???!
step off!
oh, so i'm right
Yeah one day he will be stranded off the side of the road clinging to a tree over a precipice and no-one will reach to save him because a money truck just drove by with a hole in it spewing money, and the only people around to save him will be too busy collecting the hundred dollar bills in the road to even hear his whining & moaning!
wow thanks, upvoted that!
#greedy #bigbaby
Sup Commie Jew, look, I don't give a fuck about the rewards, I just want the flags/downvotes to go away. Got it? Because the whole appeal of steemit wasn't the money for me. It was the idea of having an uncersorable social network on the blockchain. Money comes after freedom, not before. The only reason I want money is to be more free. Got it? NOW FUCK OFF KIKE.
Well, now you're on a permanent downvote list.
CONGRATULATIONS!!!
Also, do you kiss your daddy with that mouth, boy?
I agree with it, except from the last sentence/paragraph and the tags.
To buy STEEM is usually a waste of resources.
STEEM's problems far surpass mere self voting.
Then again, "curation sniping" renders self voting quite unnecessary and renders generous curation even less profitable.
Why be part off the problem? Enjoy your 1c
Did I get the right one?
Just checking.
You forgot to flag this one: https://steemit.com/@themarkymark/puvfh2
Now is not too late as you may think.
Neither is 9 hours from the time i posted it in this case and time.
Thanks for the tips!
Posted using Partiko iOS
STINC is so corrupt that your content is not accessible to read or to reply, both on steemit.com and even on steemd.com.
I had to click this comment again and somehow seems to be able to both read and reply to it.
Please downvote this one: https://steemit.com/how/@sparkesy43/sparkesy43-re-johndoer123-the-farm-is-a-no-go-20190721t134726884z
I will flag it myself, but he almost always upvotes himself especially after I flag him and often using an alt.
He even took the time to officially bitch to r0nd0n via discord so he is also protected by freezepeach, which is why it is so important to flag him during the last 12 hours before payout.
I have some things to teach you and some things that I hope that you can teach me about STEEM, and other more general tips.
Can I ask you anywhere else?
Seriously dude, WTF is your problem? I haven't issued a downvote in months.
Posted using Partiko Android
Hua? Don’t question me, I don’t have any problems, but u’r about to!
Posted using Partiko iOS
Dude don’t bitch and moan to me just because i flagged one if ur posts! Sounds like u r the 1 with the attitude and problems! I’m so over all of you!
Done, Will check back if he re-upvotes it!
Yeah I cannot believe STINC has to mess with my posts and links, and block me from every community! It's crazy, so I'm getting more steem to defend myself with! LOL maybe that was their intention!
you are just wrong, no matter what you do with your click the coins will eventually get cashed out by somebody, cause thats the game btw it's called make money and imagine bitcoin changing there white paper shit to say well next week were gonna have 42 million coins , what do you think be the investors reaction would be. The whales are not only to lazy to be good authors most are not and even more lazy to curate they really want money for doing nothing this is really not good cause reduced authors rewards will mean less content , less content means less user engagement But you seem to THINK you know it all but just dont know how to count LOL :)))
imagine what my two bitcoins would have gotten me then hmm every time they play with the voting nothing gets achieved and the coin gets dumped you wanna know why i tell you why because in the boardroom meetings all over this planet of the really big firms they hear dissension bad stuff reviews anger down voting with so much choice you wanna put your money there. please stop looking back you can't see where your going.
How is rewarding yourself any different than staking which is offered on many (much more successful) cryptocurrencies? Do you not believe staking encourages holding (powering up)?
I put thousands of my hard earned dollars into steem power as a gamble that the price will go up and I get some nice residual income coming in... how can that be so frowned upon... Dash masternodes require locking up dash to earn money so why not lock up steem for self voting?
Because we are not just straight proof-of-stake.
The reward pool has a network and, if there is no sort of value being added to the network, it makes the rationale to participate much less compelling.
When I say value, I mean knowledge, art, music, humor etc etc.
The "stake and take" mentality is a slap in the face of every one of the users that strive to do the above.
It cheapens their labor will the lazy stack coins... Coins that will degrade in value as inflation continues while the pool of those willing to buy those coins diminishes.
I used this same analogy on another comment.
Would a moth be attracted to the lamp lest there be a light? Be the light.
I put thousands of dollars into steem just to get #bitchslapped every day here! Don't complain, you got it good here!
You should probably stop downvoting people then
Self voted to offset retards downvoting me
This is unsustainable! Get off you're high horse!
Me and poor Joe can't even be seen!
Only if people aren't selling that inflation at lower prices, right? Just wasn't sure on your meaning. Thanks!
See what your problem is.
15% of 8.396% Inflation = 1.259% NOT 12% ...
I was wondering who was going to point that out to him.
If even less than .01% of these votes went to me I could be visible! It is a sham!
<10 of the accounts that have voted on this post are mine, moron.
Flagged for bidbot abuse! @iflagsteemrewards do the thing! yeah right!
Yea, cause the market really cares about you 8 whiny bitches that I flag.
Go fuck yourself, clueless moron.
This tiny spam comment could feed my blog for an entire week! lol
He's mean, moving on with that bitchtapslap!
They need the morons to buy their shit coin otherwise the price will tank as they are all in massive powerdowns... so this is to encourage the little pee ons to invest their hard earned money into the shit coins.. they think people are stupid. On top of that, if and when people do 'self vote' they will get punished by Steem Flag Rewards for doing so.. and then in turn will have to buy bot votes to earn back their reputation.. at which point they will most likely be accused of bid bot abuse.. which gives even more reason to downvote those folks.. it is like a master saying to his black slave in the 1890's here is some money go to the general store and buy yourself something nice. And then when the slave attempts to do as his master has instructed him.. he will be beat, whipped, and punished for it. And made to work 10 times harder than he already had to do before. It is sick and sadistic to advise people to do things that he knows full well they will be "financially" punished for.
It is a trap.
You hate me cause you ain’t me.
Poor schlub.
Yeah, suggesting we need a reason for people to actually buy steem is certainly hurting it.
Fuck off halfwit.
Shall we have another go at it?
I’m down. Are you?