Judicial Watch: Fighting for America
6 years ago in #freedom by valued-customer (73)
$2.98
- Past Payouts $2.98
- - Author $2.45
- - Curators $0.53
32 votes
- ausbitbank: $0.92
- krnel: $0.86
- stevescoins: $0.38
- informationwar: $0.13
- jimbobbill: $0.10
- pathforger: $0.07
- wakeupnd: $0.06
- openparadigm: $0.06
- deirdyweirdy: $0.04
- antisocialists: $0.04
- lovenfreedom: $0.03
- crimsonclad: $0.03
- geke: $0.03
- theleapingkoala: $0.03
- joe.public: $0.03
- skeptic: $0.03
- builderofcastles: $0.02
- iamstan: $0.02
- truthforce: $0.02
- johnvibes: $0.02
- and 12 more
There are many things in play here.
I completely agree with your comment.
Thanks!
In the world today, we are fear driven at worst and at best, totally lacking in trust. If it is relatively comfortable inside our shell, we do not want to come out. People like you and Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch, are more than invaluable {no pun intended}. It takes a warrior's heart. Thank you. Peace and goodwill.
That's a very good question that you pose. If I were to look at it optimistically I would say he's using game theory and when or if he makes his move it's going to overwhelmingly devastate the opposition party in such a way where there will be no chance for them to gain office in 2020.
The Epstein island thing is disturbing. Question is, is that all that goes down on that island. We're talking about billionaires here. Could be all sorts of shenanigans, tax shelters, or private tax free business dealings going on.
I did find one interview where Trump talked about Epstein, he called him a terrific guy but was also able to drop the fact in there that he likes his girlfriends a bit on the younger side.
I don’t know if those words were calculated on his part or not but it seemed like he was trying to distinguish Epstein's behaviors from his own, but that might not necessarily mean anything one way or the other.
One thing is for certain if the deep state is a dragon and he wants to slay it he's got to hit at the right place and at the right time while also being sure footed and on solid ground. I think in business as a competitor Trump is the kind of guy who strikes while the iron is hot and many times people don't even see it coming.
He does like to keep people in a state of wonder, either that or he operates so far in the clutch that many times he doesn't know what move he's going to make, but ends up making the right one on gut instinct alone.
He's a master communicator, as Scott Adams has said.
However, he's also very dependent on the Rothschild's financially, and has been since the 1980s.
Regarding Epstein, @funbobby51 pointed out that while he had ridden Epstein's Lolita Express more than once, there is no public confirmed information that he visited Epstein's island, which I assumed was the destination of those flights.
Epstein, however, has been shown to be an FBI informant in recent court documents, and many believe his island was operated as a honeypot and brownstone operation for federal and international agencies. I expect Mossad had a direct feed.
Thanks!
There is lot's of evidence of Clinton's many visits to teenage sex slave island but I have not seen Trump's documented, Trump has been on the Lolita Express though. Could you hire the best of the best from the banking industry without hiring anyone who has ever worked at Goldman Sachs?
I think the best of the best of the banking industry is an oxymoron, but that's not even the real point. Trump has been long beholden to the Rothschilds through their agent Wilber Ross' bailing him out decades ago when he was threatened with bankruptcy. He looks to be in their pocket, and the appointments seem to strongly confirm that.
I may have to thank you for pointing out that my information is that Trump was on the Lolita Express, and that I conflated that with visiting Epstein's island. I may not be wrong, but can't recall the specifics, except that he did indeed fly Epstein.
Thanks!
I can't say how Trump will turn out, perhaps he will be a shill for Goldman like Hillary was, but if you wanted to usurp Goldman Sachs wouldn't you want some former insiders on your side? realistically wouldn't you need them?
What!
I have way too many snakes on my land. So..... I need to get more of the same kind of snakes and that will somehow rid my property of the snakes. Not going to work will never work. That would only rid my property of myself. Birds of a feather flock together, There is nothing new under the sun.
This is more like if you cant beat them then join them. Not going to fix anything to acquiesce to their demands.
There is only one rule in play here. "He who owns the gold rules"
Elequently spoken mate, Cheers.
that's a whole lot of aphorisms. So you would try to take down Goldman without any help from anyone who ever worked there and knows their operation?
Honestly Goldman Sachs would be out of business today had not the federal reserve been allowed to bail them out and let them buy out other smaller banks with taxpayer dollars.
Ending the unconstitutional "Federal Reserve Bank" stops all the Bankster problems we have. The Banksters are the problem(snakes on our land) not the solution.
And would that be easier to achieve with the help of people experienced with it?
Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)
Relevance: Sharing the truth.
Up vote this comment if you wish to support us.
Congratulations @valued-customer! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your Board of Honor.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPDo not miss the last announcement from @steemitboard!