I didn't mean to single you out like that. Bias in this case is to be expected (So am I). I do not know you personally so I am only offering examples.

So an example of a safety precaution that you may not care about is the banning of kids food

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwimmumAvPPgAhXpguAKHSiTD3QQzPwBegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2Fcalifornia-gives-new-meaning-to-nanny-state-with-proposed-regulations-on-kids-meals&psig=AOvVaw0uA8YpZ4e6oMsdqtctyiyH&ust=1552166249681163

So the relationship between freedom and safety are based on feelings or values
I 100% agree with you. But the original quote in question used the number zero, meaning nothing. When we change it to a small number or like you said less freedom/less crime then it is subjected to feelings and values.

Thanks for your comments. Made me think about the topic from a different perspective.