What about autovotes that vote the same amount on no matter what you post? Do you think all those autovoting constantly check on the posts to make sure its deserving of the reward they cast on it?
Why can someone who is also invested in the platform not change the reward he thinks the post deserves compared to the ones that vote it up thinking it deserves it?
This i know is a big problem, i have questioned this myself in past posts. I have members autovoting me, i dont earn alot but would prefer them to read my posts as i could have possibly wrote a brilliant one that gets the same vote as my crap ones.
Exactly. The entitlement and self-defensive nature authors get from receiving their first flags is a problem often caused by reoccurring autovotes and them getting used to being rewarded each and every time.
I would rather be read by a person and voted on the strength of my post and not keep seeing the same names and same voting power. I write a lot abot my life, I get the same vote for a post from my heart and a meme post. That I agree is wrong.
Yeah I know that feeling... That's why I hope a lot more curators will stay manual in the future.
I have to admit posting more about my life is put off by the voting, as you can see by my account I gain very little but its still a massive help, I am put off writing more meaningful posts as I know it wont get read.