I've been toying with the idea of a manual curation flagging account, similar to what Curie does but to help clean up the ecosystem a bit. If I put something like that off the ground, would you be interested in delegating to it?
I think it's a great idea, but unfortunately I have nothing to delegate. You can try, but I doubt any of the users who would have anything worth to delegate, would be interested.
I'll make the attempt, regardless! Delegation is harmless to the delegator so I don't see why I won't pick up a few people willing to help. Thanks for the support.
Greetings! This is the first I've heard of it. I'll take a look before I do anything, but here's the general idea of this project specifically:
Purpose
To assist with the efforts of @steemcleaners and other flagging accounts through manual submission and review of content that is specifically mis-tagged via a kind and manual system of warning, flagging, and rewarding.
Criteria for Flagging
The post must be from an author who is a repeat offender of mis-tagging.
No first time offenses! (We all make mistakes sometimes)
All content in the post, photos, video or otherwise must be manually reviewed to verify that tags are truly inaccurate.
Execution
A community interface (likely Discord) will be created where approved and trusted curators will be able to submit posts for review.
Once a post has been verified to have been authored by a repeat offender, the post will be commented on from the @name account with a warning about the inaccurate tag and a process for remedying it.
If no action is taken within the established timeframe (variable, decreased for repeat offenders), then the post will be flagged by the @name account with a strength proportionate to the number of incorrect tags (1 tag, 20%, 2 tags, 40%, and so on) up to and not exceeding a percentage that would take the rewards to zero.
If, in the event that the author remedies the miscategorization of their post, their post will be upvoted with 10% of @name's voting strength.
I'm specifically aiming for mis-classified content, nothing else.
flagging is a waste of time and neither of them are going anywhere etc etc just wasting everyones time
I disagree with flagging being a waste of time. Flagging is the most important function in the Steemit ecosystem, in my opinion.
I wish people did it more.
A lot of the problems on Steemit could be nullified by a healthy flagging culture.
I doubt it'll ever happen, though.
keyword: healthy
I disagree with that comment more than just about any comment on Steemit - I think flagging totally sucks and I'd bin it in instance.
Here is what flagging looks like:
https://steemit.com/@caladium
I've been toying with the idea of a manual curation flagging account, similar to what Curie does but to help clean up the ecosystem a bit. If I put something like that off the ground, would you be interested in delegating to it?
~ Mako
I think it's a great idea, but unfortunately I have nothing to delegate. You can try, but I doubt any of the users who would have anything worth to delegate, would be interested.
Good luck, though.
I'll make the attempt, regardless! Delegation is harmless to the delegator so I don't see why I won't pick up a few people willing to help. Thanks for the support.
~ Mako
Doesn't something like that already exist in SFR, steemflagrewards?
So what are we doing here anyway? Is this a social media platform or a video game where we build armies to flag each other to bits?
If it's a video game; I want better graphics. Greetings.
Steemit is its own unique beast, to be fair.
The irony of SFR being supported by both wasn't lost on me, but I wasn't aware that Steemit was their personal playground.
Greetings! This is the first I've heard of it. I'll take a look before I do anything, but here's the general idea of this project specifically:
I'm specifically aiming for mis-classified content, nothing else.
~ Mako
So you have been on Steemit since August this year and now you are deciding what to flag?
You will go far... Hopefully far from Steemit!
Cute
~ Mako