Do you have information about whether this letter really helps those affected? especially because the processes they perform are totally flawed and complain to whoever executes them is like talking to the wall
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Look at Kruse VS HAWAII
The letter is not an entire fix. Its a beginning of a process, where as your writing them to tell them theyre violating your protected rights. Its very hard to SUE. a state. But an agency at the county level is the aim. The response of the letter is what individual will use as docket A, later evidence.
I've read a few today where theyre in the home, and the family is feeling duress. What could be done here is simple outline of rights in the beginning followed by a series of questions. Then requiring the parties signatures.
The letter initially is crucial as it strips the agency of the ability in civil court to claim 11th Amendment protections. (And this will be their first defense as it usually is used for STATE prorections.
Wouldve KRUSE used the letter, she wouldve satisfied the burden of proof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rooker%E2%80%93Feldman_doctrine
I will write a sample letter, along with something others can use in home (if necessary) to help get them out, or at least strike fear into them.
Thanks for the great question @mgaby. I hope I answered your question, satisfactorily.
https://steemit.com/familyprotection/@ihashblox/combatting-dhs-cps-child-support-sample-documents-7e1e2bff807a5