The Calderon/Frodsham/Osteraas case is a really sad case but from all the investigations they did they claim there was no indication anything was wrong with the foster home prior to the child being placed there. The child's name was Devani and there is no record of her death.
Lori Handrahan is a professor that decided to write a book about the child rape issues that are going on in Maine. She claimed that her ex kidnapped their daughter and was doing things with her. She was fired for her job and lost a federal case was ordered to pay 3/4 million dollars to her ex and child in damages. As the courts found that there was no evidence.
What we do know is that people that hurt children are very good at hiding who they really are and what they really do. And many times when they are found out even the people that know them and are close to them are shocked as they had no clue. Most of these people live normal lives and show no outside evidence of what they are. Both of the case you brought are of children that were raped The first case was a foster parent and he is now serving 17 years in prison. The second got custody of his daughter (whom he was supposed to have been abusing) and the mother was ordered to pay a substantial amount of money for damages. Not only did the mother claim the father was abusing the child she claimed he was apart of a ring of people doing these things. As mush as I know they exist I can say that no court would place that amount of money as damages if there was a shadow of doubt. This was a federal court that placed this debt on her. It makes one wonder why she lost her job and this court did this to her. After reading all the reports I can only question if this was real or was she using this as a way to get custody of her child. If it was my child I would have had evidence to support my claim surely if the father was raping his toddler daughter there would have been evidence. The only evidence I was able to find was a report that a forensic medical team in Maine, hired by Child Protective Services (CPS) You can read the report here. https://medium.com/@LoriHandrahan2/judge-moskowitz-mila-the-black-rock-b4d8efa704ae
This report is of a 2 year old talking to an adult about what happened. I will not go into the details but it does not seem right. Her comments are not ones that a 2 year old would say and when asked a random question she could not answer.
Before you say to me that I have no idea what a 2 year old would say I will remind you that I have 2 children, and I spent 5 years as a day care worker 2 of those years I ran a home day care. I have taken many college classes about early childhood development. And when I was a foster parent I had 2 teenagers and close to 100 toddlers come through my home. So I can tell you that these statements are not what a toddler would say. I have spoken to children that have been abused and they simply do not come right out and say these words and than not answer a question on what they were wearing.
Before you bash me in this please go read this report.
And I am saddened to say that in this case I simply do not believe the mother. I feel she coached her daughter in these interviews and without physical evidence to support her claim I can see how a federal judge would award such damages.
On further reading I was able to find mention of a physical exam done on the child that indicated there was NO Evidence of genital or rectal trauma. You can read this here https://www.scribd.com/document/196480488/Spurwink-Report-of-Mila-s-Sex-Abuse-Report-3
For this part of the report please look at the bottom of page 3 and the start of page 4.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
So you find these half-assed russian reports upvote worthy but you can't even read the details of the osteraas case where she was not set on fire but boiled alive in a trash can? That was the second foster parent she was placed with who should not have passed a background check to work at mcdonald's much less be an adoptive parent.
You must not have read my investigation into Lori's case, because I found extensive evidence that her husband and michael waxman were engaged in harassment and fraud against her.
So now that I have corroborating evidence of what family protection is and know what you are, which is a joke, goodbye!
@mindhawk I researched these cases and even provided the links to the actual reports that showed there was NO PHYSICAL evidence that the child was ever raped. Where are you getting different evidence? Please share. I do not know what you are talking about russian reports. Unless you are talking about some of the posts that use the familyprotection tag that do not get upvoted.
curlfamilyvlog, saying ''you've researched the case'' tells me a lot about you. Giving you the benefit of the doubt it can only mean one thing, you don't know how to research. If you look into her case it's impossible to arrive at the conclusion you have. For you to understand this case it requires more hours than you could imagine. Everything is linked and you can only learn the truth if you look into every aspect of her case.
This is the link to the actual report that I am talking about. If I was not clear as this is the actual Medical Evaluation Report done on the child. https://www.scribd.com/document/196480488/Spurwink-Report-of-Mila-s-Sex-Abuse-Report-3
"Genital and rectal examination were performed in a supinesemi-recumbent position on mom's lap. Present in the room during the examination were Mila, her mother, my adrriinistrative assistant, and myself. On an anxiety scale of 0-5, Mila was minimally anxious with a level of 1. Labia majora and labia minora were normal. On labial separation, the hymen did not dilate; on labial traction, the hymen dilated transversely to 3 mm. Hymen was U shaped, with no breaks or scars. There was no evidence of vaginal discharge or vaginal bleeding. SUlcus was normal. Urethra was normal. Posterior fourchette and fossana vicularis were normal. Anal-rectalarea had normal appearance. Perineum was normal. There was normal rectal sphincter tone"
On the following page he states that there is no evidence that shows any recent trauma.
@mindhawk Just so we are perfectly clear quoted straight from the news report. " When deputies arrived, they learned a 5-year-old girl had sustained significant burns as a result of hot water from a bath tub." You can read the full report here. https://arizonadailyindependent.com/2017/01/10/pima-county-mother-charged-with-burning-adoptive-child-dcs-failed/
[-]curlfamilyvlog, it's sloppy amateur work like you have displayed is typical why so many children are dragged from loving mothers like Lori and handed over to monsters like Igor. Social media is the only hope those fighting the system have, it has become become obvious it's a false hope. So if Lori was a close family member of yours, you would sleep well knowing their baby is better off with the father and you totaly comfortable with this decision? The problem is you haven't a clue what you are up against and instead of trying to make a difference you are making it worse.
Even knowing her ex Igor married again, she became pregnant almost straight away and then divorced him 18 months later because both her and the baby were been abused. Waxman (lawyer that took Lori's baby) got Igor full custody of their child. You still comfortable this monster now has two little girls? Did this concern you at all how the Director of Computer Crimes in Maine Lt. Glenn Lang received scanned shots of proof that Igor's computer had been on child pornography sites, and his email that says, “what are you offering?” He refused to investigate. In the case of Kennebunk, Zumba Prostitution Scandal, Child Porn was found and covered up. There were approximately 178 Johns discovered. Lt. Lang said he “lost the computer” that had all the evidence. There are many more examples but i'm sure you've looked into all these and feel they are irrelevant.
You went on how you worked in daycare, for mindhawk not to bash you and you feel sorry for the mum. That's precisely why she is getting frustrated with you, she has done her research and like me she gets frustrated with do-gooders like yourself that are totally ignorant of this case and have the nerve to tell us we are wrong. I will briefly explain why i feel so strong about this case.
I always knew she was telling the truth, about a month ago i was reading the comments after she was interviewed and i came across a very well written detailed reason why they thought otherwise. I couldn't prove him wrong even though there was no doubt in my mind she was telling the truth. This played on me for a few days because i didn't know the case as well as i thought. I spent the next month going over every aspect of her case, you wouldn't believe me if i told you how many hours this was. I'm not an emotional person but i shed more tears in that month than i had all my years previously. I have never been more sure about anything like i am now. She is telling the truth and if you or anyone else is prepared to actually research her story you will feel the same. How can you fix a system when you don't understand how it actually works. Government built the system, every crack that appears over time they make a law that will fix it. They appoint the head of every department, they make the rules and can change those rules whenever it suits them. The only part of the system they do not have full control of is social media. Put yourself in her shoes, how would you feel if the public agreed with government allowing them to hand your child over to these monsters without even looking her side of the story?