How about "in line with not powering down and cashing out", which would be my greatest short term criteria for enhancing the value of steem.
And how about a column for "in line with purchasing steem" so that actual authors of posts can cash out without crashing the steem price - thus enhancing the reputation of steemit among content creators.
These are good questions to ask. I believe there are already some users that are building regular reports with this data though.
I would recommend reading this post on downvotes/flags: https://steemit.com/payout/@timcliff/everything-you-need-to-know-about-potential-payouts-and-flagging-for-new-users
You do not need to make a very big adjustment in order to be in line with the experiment. Voting with 80% voting power would be within the threshold.
The downvote has nothing to do with you personally. It is not a disagreement with how you are using your stake. It is an attempt to redistribute some influence towards users with less stake.
I read your post on downvotes/flags when it came out (you will notice my 100% upvote 6th from the top). I will re-read it now.
I recommend that you read this new post which I have promoted (I am not the author):
https://steemit.com/steemit/@williambanks/how-to-make-steemit-great-again-in-5-easy-steps
Thanks for the mention! Also thanks for the promotion!
I read it when it showed up in my feed this morning :)