Should STEEM be more like DASH ?!?!?
Only DASH stakeholders get to influence development & policy.
DASH pays 45% worth of mined coins to miners, 45% to developers, 10 % to other DASH 'workers' such as Amanda B Johnson who is their (FABULOUS) PR girl.
DASH developers have to be 'insiders'. They have to be integral to the DASH team.
Only DASH team members can VOTE on development, policy & protocols.
Very importantly, DASH master node operators can vote, but in order to be a master node operator you have to buy the privilege by purchasing a $1000 worth of DASH.
The only people who can VOTE on policy & protocol in DASH are DASH STAKEHOLDERS.
Bitcoin node operators DO NOT GET PAID - THEY ARE VOLUNTEERS!!!!
DASH has many more master node operators than Bitcoin.
Now do you see why Bitcoin node operators do NOT want their work load increased !!!!!!!!!!!!
Now do you see why Bitcoin transactions are so slow - too slow for everyday use AND TOO EXPENSIVE.
Bitcoin not only outsources its development but outsources to corporate mega giants who are perfectly willing to personally benefit from their 'development' contributions to Bitcoin by selling these developments to Bitcoin, rather than sharing the benefits equally with all Bitcoiners.
These outside Bitcoin developers probably own some Bitcoins so will experience an increase in Bitcoin wealth if their 'developments' increase the value of Bitcoin coins. BUT they are also incentivised to merely line their own non-Bitcoin pockets by making a profit for their own companies on the apps & codes they flog off to Bitcoin ..
Now see where unpaid volunteer node operators & paying outside developers for their products, got Bitcoin ??????????????
Is STEEM's business model same as DASH's or more like (stupid) Bitcoin.
Bitcoin's meteoric rise is due mainly to market sentiment ---
DASH may very well surpass Bitcoin eventually - their business model is much fairer & very much more user-friendly .....
Sounds to me like STEEM developers should get paid more ........