A few weeks ago, Big.one took the initiative to organize an election simulation.
The condition to be able to participate to the this simulation was:
- To open an account with them
- To send 1 EOS on there platform and accept to "freeze" it for the duration of the voting simulation.
I do not have the exact number of participants as Big.One is not a champion for transparency*, but I know a lot of people all around the globe has been sending at least 1 EOS in order to be able to participate to the simulation (like I did).
The funny thing is that when I wanted to get this 1 EOS out from Big.One (once the simulation was over), the withdrawal procedure did not worked.
After that, I have sent an email to complain. They did not answered to my question. They simply told me that to withdraw my 1 EOS involves a fee of 0.1 EOS (10% in my case!) When I tried a second time to withdraw, same as the first time, I was not able to go through the withdrawal process. My feeling at this point was already a negative one.
Today, I'm reading your article and I understand now the final goal they were targeting, self-voting for themselves with there customer's Token!!!
Big.One deserves a huge sanction! I invite all the community to cancell the votes they have given to Big.One and re-attribute them to straight and honest teams who deserves to be elected!
Have a nice day, keep acting in a honest way!
Thierry
*I'm going to take some time to study Big.One's ETH wallet in order to evaluate how many EOS they received for this simulation of vote
Hi Thierry thank you for this valuable information. I'd like to recommend to also share in the eosgov telegram group, they are having a heated discussion about how to build an arbitration case, so your info and reason to stand is just what they are looking for