lol... it's always possible to cherry pick one little point and use that to proove the other guy is "false".

"Advanced state of readiness" is a subjective thing, not a thing provable by one detailed question.

Overall, ECAF was ready because it was able to handle the cases that came in. Look at the history of the 7 frozen accounts. ECAF did its thing, returned its results. As far as I can see, no particular case was badly handled beyond what you would expect in the normal starting phase of a complex and complicated operation.

(And did so securely. BPs were not confused. BPs knew who they were talking to. It might be that the public saw confusing results. But that's not the same as the BPs being confused.)