I'm not even sure why this is a debate. I'd hazard that the those debating and condemning this matter have not lost their tokens. They would be singing a whole different tune.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm not even sure why this is a debate. I'd hazard that the those debating and condemning this matter have not lost their tokens. They would be singing a whole different tune.
yes, people are influenced by a side that will benefit them. Ones that have not have funds stolen and are against the restoration would hope that one day it is not their crypto that is stolen! If we think that the future really is cryptocurrency can we really see a future where funds restoration is never ever possible at all? Seems like a dangerous future where hackers would have rights over property that they do not even own and the rest of us are powerless to strike back, left limp by the debilitating prevailing deontological argument.