Thanks for your reply. Yes they repeat the claim of block.one controlling the 12 bp candidates on serveral occasions, but i didn't find more evidence than the 4 that i've mentioned in my post. So the rest i consider as simply unproven as of yet. Still there lacks a proper reply from block.one side.
As regards EvolutionOS as such, of course a democratic approach looks interesting, but not sure how they effectively intend to prevent sybil attacks. And the era of figures like Trump, Putin, Erdogan, and a Brexit clearly demonstrates the limitations and fallacies possible in democracy.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thanks for the reply too :D
Is good to know that you have done your own research, i need to dig a bit and see what can i found.
Was taking a look at sybil attacks. ended up reading an article ( on letstalkbitcoin ): Solution to Sybil attacks and 51% attacks in Decentralized Networks . Proof-of-reputation was a method i did not know about :)
The proof-of-stake equal money = power, world runs that way and i do not think is doing right imo, too much greed :)
Whitepaper are like constitutions... (?). i need to take a look at the EvolutionOS paper(s) :)