well, you'd need a stakeholder approved constitution to even start all this. there can be no ruling without a rulebook
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
well, you'd need a stakeholder approved constitution to even start all this. there can be no ruling without a rulebook
What process would you suggest to get to a future where we have a stakeholder approved constitution? Can we use DPOS for this and let BPs announce their stance on the constitution (maybe ratify individual articles at a time) and let voters support BPs based on that? DPOS hasn't been a direct democracy, and I'm not convinced it would be a good thing to become one.
So we recognize things are broken. How do we fix them? What's the path forward?
Prior to the chain existing, many months of discussions happened in the forums. At what level should we value that effort?
gave this some thought, how about this:
Group certain parts of a constitution and let stakeholders vote on it.
eg.
chain-related:
this needs to be split, eg Arbitration? if yes > what exactly?
and so on, make it a smartcontract, let people choose how long they want to support what they voted on, write this to the blockchain/display it on profiles so anyone dealing with account xyz knows what to expect from them.
edit: scatter could then show consensus between your constitution and the other party - for example
edit2: majority voted pargrahps should be no opt-out
edit3: make the smartcontract open, so anyone could add whatever they think would fit. may be spammy, but that way everyone has the chance to add and vote on what they see fit.
DApps could basically ask for you to accept certain parts of a constitution in order to allow you to participate.
I have no idea how this could happen to be honest.