Well ... maybe not defined, but explained. Here is a video exposing it.
And here is the link Gary provided on his video.
http://www.libertywritersnews.com/2016/10/breaking-hillarys-playbook-rigging-election-just-leaked-shes/
Just scroll down towards the bottom. Kinda interesting how they "over-sample" different nationalities.
Please spread this and give him a like on his video.
So... they aren't rigging the election at all. Got it.
At least O'Keefe presented a plan that involved actually affecting the election (too bad it's implausible to bus enough people to have any actual effect.)
I am confused by your statement. I honestly believe she is rigging the election every possible way possible. The video as well as the link show how they skew the polls to make the general public believe she is lading. Being from California, I know that most people tend to go with the crowd. Hillary knows this as well. It should be implausible for a candidate to have pre-dedicated delegates before a primary election. Unnfortunately the DNC does, ask Bernie Sanders how he feels about them, after the election.
Is it also "rigging the election" to do well in the debate so people want to vote for her?
Or how about running an ad that makes her look good?
It's not rigging to do things that lead people to want to vote for you. That's literally the entire job of a candidate. You might even notice Trump and his supporters constantly claiming they are ahead in online polls!
RCP has a poll showing Hillary up by 5 in Arizona. It over samples Democrats by 38%.
This is now the norm among the MSM. They did it with Brexit and are ramping it up now.
I know you want her to win but please don't be deliberately obtuse.
I didn't say the polls weren't skewed, I said skewing polls is not rigging an election.
It's literally the same as Trump claiming the lead in online polls.
It certainly is rigging the election. While it may not be illegal, it definitely is unethical to rig polls. The free press is supposed to be a public trust and conduct its data collection and reporting ethically. Creating a false perception that one candidate versus another is leading or behind based on skewed metrics is a reflection of rigging and corrupting that public trust.
Tag Spam = Using irrelevant tags, especially popular tags. Using tags improperly makes it hard to find good and relevant content.
Please use relevant tags when posting! Abusing tags can potentially lead to people flagging you, even from dan himself.
Specific Tags
#steemit / #steem
Please only use the steemit tag for articles distinctly related to steemit itself.
I am sorry for using the steemit / steem tags and will refrain from using them in the future. I have to ask you however, why in this most polarized election are tags such as politics, election, hillary or trump, not even on the "show more topics" link? The main reason I joined steemit was because you could post and search using the tag politics or election or religion. Sure, I can still post using those tags, but my post would be lost within 15 minutes of being posted. As it stands now, politics, election and religion have been missing from that "show more topics" link for the last 2 or 3 weeks. As I said, I will avoid using steemit / steem as tags, but you must understand that I'm very frustrated at this point.