You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Hey Steemit Libertarians, I debated the death penalty with a conservative...

in #dtube7 years ago (edited)

Small as in Wilson NY USA likely will get it wrong. You need larger and deeper quorums. As in larger, well vetted, and some of it held in secret against others in the group. In my case it would be easy. No death warrant, no trial, no conviction, no appeal (2 of them), no formal charge levied, no arrest, no detention, stateless and immune person, etc... Murder.

Sort:  

How can you have been murdered and are still posting on Steemit?

I spoke to that already. Intervention proves the event. Your views are in error. Cause the death == Murder.

That SHOULD be obvious to you.

You keep saying that the State euthanized/murdered you yet you are alive to post on Steemit. The fact that you are alive proves your assertion that the state euthanized/murdered you to be wrong.

It is a matter how it is done. Your view overall is that since I am alive I was not dead. Proves you the fool anew.

Eh?

It is not an issue of how it is done it is an issue with you not knowing the definitions of the words that you are using.

Is it your modus operandi to commit an ad hominem fallacy whenever anyone challenges you on your inconsistent and incoherent posts?

You have now incorrectly called me a fraud, a liar and a fool. I am asking you again to stop. If you choose not to then you will see just how acerbic my tongue can get.

It is a matter how it is done. Your view overall is that since I am alive I was not dead. Proves you the fool anew.

Eh?

Your views and points of logic, really are so fringe and wrong responding to them is a waste of time. You seem only to find fault with a problem without asking what it is first. Overall.

And in your mind medical intervention to revive a corpse somehow vindicates those who murdered a child.... EESH!

Your views and points of logic, really are so fringe and wrong responding to them is a waste of time.

I am still, at this point, trying to get a coherent and consistent statement out of you.

And in your mind medical intervention to revive a corpse somehow vindicates those who murdered a child.... EESH!

I thought the medical professionals colluded with agents of the law to prevent your resuscitation.

And in your mind medical intervention to revive a corpse somehow vindicates those who murdered a child.

I never even came close to saying that and I would appreciate you NOT putting words in my mouth simply because I am calling you on your incoherence and inconsistency.

"I thought the medical professionals colluded with agents of the law to prevent your resuscitation."

Some did some did not.... recall Canada?

Again YOUR logic is of no use as I already pointed out.