Very relevant post. It's amazing how quickly something as innovative as this could be limited by the law. And it's unfortunate for what it could mean for the arts. But at the same time I get it if it's being used as a violation of peoples' private property. It's illegal in my jurisdiction for a plane to fly over your property with the intent of taking photos without consent. So what's the difference if it's a drone doing this.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: