You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What do you think about @burnpost & @sbdpotato

in #dpoll5 years ago

What's you deal downvoting posts that reward flags against spam? I would advise not doing that.

Unless you are into your investment losing value. Whether you acknowledge it or not, we are doing you a service.

Please, try to let go of the past. It's not profitable to hold onto things like that and I hear holding grudges is bad for your health.

Peace ✌️

Sort:  

Lol why bother? He's just gonna recite the same bs about "eye for an eye".

Unless you are into your investment losing value.

Better check out what he is delegating to.

Plz follow me

Please, don't beg for follows. It's unbecoming and will likely subject you to downvotes.

Create compelling content and being genuine is how you earn followers. Will check back on your progress.

I don't like their multiple standards. They downvote bots, bought upvotes. But they themselves post machine generated shit posts, and upvote those shit. I despise that fucking behavior. The value of their post is too high. I downvote to neutralize them, and I hope you can join us☺

The value of their post is too high.

Not really if you properly appraise the risk of engaging in negative curation against bad actors. Those posts set such individuals as beneficiaries. The way I see, if anything they are undervalued. The rewards are well earned for the activity and energy committed to the chain.

But you're entitled to your opinion however unfair it is. It's easy to generalize people and miss the forest for the trees. I think such is your error.

Your thought is too rough. You value people by what one did, not by each posts they write. It's like if a good man rape your wife, you still appraise it's good, cause the other things he did is good grossly.
That's not how law works. People should be judge by each behavior(or a sequence if they're associated)