This seems fair... in my opinion $200 is pretty high. At current steem price, anything over $100 on a post with 90% bitbots use should be somewhat flagged if it doesn’t bring value. Time will tell after HF 21 😎
This seems fair... in my opinion $200 is pretty high. At current steem price, anything over $100 on a post with 90% bitbots use should be somewhat flagged if it doesn’t bring value. Time will tell after HF 21 😎
Yeah, I think 100 should be under scrutiny, maybe lower on some.
Makes sense to start at the top of the list and make your way down, then there is no need to put a value out there at any point?
I agree, wipe out the worst of them first. Top 10 bidders a day get a 25% down vote until it's reasonable. Eventually, people will learn to avoid bidding their way on to first couple pages of trending 'all'.
People are still free to use bots and do whatever they want (this includes downvoting, too).
Posted using Partiko Android
Yep, i think that if incurring a loss, they will make different decisions, no matter how much they say "it is for promotion" :)
Yeah it does. It is just something to consider because payout is going to fluctuate with price, so factor in the Steem being allocated from the pool.
Agreed 💯
Posted using Partiko iOS