There are many billions of people believing in things you and I don't. Like their governments have their best interest in mind.
Facts are not dictated by democracy.
Though you certainly should go with what works for you.
There are many billions of people believing in things you and I don't. Like their governments have their best interest in mind.
Facts are not dictated by democracy.
Though you certainly should go with what works for you.
I think about it like this. Satanists believe in Satan and it mitigates their behavior (and not in a good way, needless to say). So ultimately it doesn't matter if he exists or not. The same can be said for Jesus and Christians (real ones). I've seen enough evidence that he was an actual person to convince me... He wasn't "invented" at Nicea... I've heard the theories that Constantine created him out of the Filius Invictum (victorious son) that he worshipped. The truth is that although Constantine attended he stayed in the background and let the bishops do their thing.
What was decided at Nicea was the divinity of Christ... he was real, the divine part is open to conjecture. By the way, I'm still researching the Annunaki. It seems that they weren't the first- they were preceded by the Ancient Ones (whom they were afraid of). The ancient ones were Gods- the Annunaki were astronauts that manipulated the DNA of the humans created by the Ancient Ones to make slaves.
So the person in charge of the government attended almost 2000 years ago, but he didn't do anything.
Are you trying to sell me a bridge?
You can't know that. Neither can I. Yet it certainly does not fit with most "rulers" I am aware of.
They also make such claims often. Probability is high given precedence of the claims being propaganda.
It is also difficult to know since pretty much only the Clergy and Nobles tended to be well versed in writing. It was kept that way for some time.
I am fine with you believing it.
I am fine with considering it as possible. I will not consider it a certainty. I require facts and evidence for that, and I know without a time machine I'm not likely to get it in this case.
Ancient History is incredibly interesting to follow. When someone tries to hide a discovery that just Streisand Effects me and I become even more interested.
Sometime you should check out Dinosaurs Co-existing with humans in Central America and the rather extensive evidence that is just boxed away in some museums and private collections down there. It blew my mind. If I stumble upon a good link I'll shoot it your way. Very compelling, and buried discoveries.
So the person in charge of the government attended almost 2000 years ago, but he didn't do anything.
Are you trying to sell me a bridge?
You can't know that. Neither can I. Yet it certainly does not fit with most "rulers" I am aware of.
They also make such claims often. Probability is high given precedence of the claims being propaganda.
It is also difficult to know since pretty much only the Clergy and Nobles tended to be well versed in writing. It was kept that way for some time.
I am fine with you believing it.
I am fine with considering it as possible. I will not consider it a certainty. I require facts and evidence for that, and I know without a time machine I'm not likely to get it in this case.
Ancient History is incredibly interesting to follow. When someone tries to hide a discovery that just Streisand Effects me and I become even more interested.
Sometime you should check out Dinosaurs Co-existing with humans in Central America and the rather extensive evidence that is just boxed away in some museums and private collections down there. It blew my mind. If I stumble upon a good link I'll shoot it your way. Very compelling, and buried discoveries.