Conceived in a time when women were objectified and underestimated, The Doctor has managed to regenerate beyond gender biases. Can the audience?
SPOILER WARNING: If you have yet to watch the Doctor Who Christmas Special "Twice upon a time" and do not wish to be spoiled till you do, just bookmark it and come back to read it after you've watched the episode. Otherwise, here come all the
The trauma of regeneration
The lives of Time Lords are a curious thing. They experience death and are reborn a dozen (or more) times over centuries, each time turning into a different person who just happens to carry the memories of their previous self. No Doctor ever welcomed regeneration and the cycle of death and rebirth that is part of Time Lord existence, and this year's Christmas special is, in many ways, about that.
Regeneration isn't only hard on The Doctor, but it can be emotionally taxing for the audience as well. The Doctor, versatile and lovable as he always is, became part of us. And then he died, replaced by another we learn to love until they too pass. The cycle goes on and this time it shook the fandom deeper than ever before with The Doctor regenerating, for the first time in the series (canon) history, in female form.
Previously this type of transformation happened only in fanfiction and porn parodies. So I believe that the showrunners choice to give The Doctor a woman's face and voice in this regeneration, just in time for 2018, is a sign of the times. But why is this regeneration harder for the conservative Whovians to accept than any previous change of actor and Doctor character?
The crotchety man in the box
In "Twice Upon a Time" we get a two for one deal, with both the 1st doctor and the 12th faced with the same fear of regeneration - fear of extreme change that is both terrifying and inevitable. Mid-regeneration, both are trying to escape its outcome, and both eventually give in and accept it.
To me, the loud minority of conservatives screaming that a female Doctor would be the end of the show, and is an attempt by the BBC to brainwash children with feminism are just that - dying men scared of letting go of the Doctor as he is, and allowing him to change. In a reply to all the naysayers claiming that a female Doctor would rob little boys of a role model, Colin Baker (the 6th Doctor) said: "You don't have to be of a gender to be a role model."
Fortunately, the majority of fans embraced this regeneration and evolution in the series and its main character, but that loud minority still needs to come to terms with Jodie Whittaker as the Doctor. At least, that is what the showrunners believe.
One does not have to be an old Whovian or watch any pre-2005 episodes of the series to see the clear difference between the first Doctor, originally described in 1963 as "a crotchety man in a Police Box" and the 12th Doctor played by Peter Capaldi. This difference becomes especially clear when the character of previously deceased Bill Potts makes her entrance.
The interaction between the 1st Doctor and Bill is fascinating, giving perfect contrast to the change in The Doctor's perception of gender since the 1960s. There is Bill, a black lesbian companion of The Doctor, refusing to clean the TARDIS, and rather amused by the 1st Doctor's threats to give her a good spanking. It seems the character of the WWI soldier in the episode was there, at least in part, to give the 1st Doctor someone to share the outdated outlook at women with.
That gentle poking at the subtle misogyny and sexism of the 60s era Doctor is not just there for comic relief. In fact, it might just be the most important takeaway from the episode. The contrast between the conservative 60s Doctor, and the fresh female face of Doctor 13 is almost too blunt in making its point.
Forget it or not?
It would probably be easier for the Doctor to try and repress his past. Not only the terrible things he has done as The War Doctor, but the way he regarded women over the years. The 12th Doctor doesn't even try to excuse his previous self's obvious misogyny when the 1st Doctor threatens Bill with a "smacked bottom" for calling the Doctor a "stupid arse". He would rather ignore it and forget it. He asks Bill if they can just pretend it never happened. Can we pretend the Doctor was never as misogynistic as the rest of our culture half a century back?
Doctor: "Can we just never ever talk about it again?"
Bill: "Oh I hope we talk about it loads. That we spend years laughing about it."
So the goal here isn't to repress the old behaviors of past, but rather to deal with them by overcoming our shame and awkwardness, coming to a point where we can laugh about it instead of judging one another and our past selves. And we do, as an audience, we giggle at the 1st Doctor's and WWI soldier's response to the discovery that Bill is a lesbian. We cringe when the 12th Doctor makes excuses for having a guitar on the TARDIS. We remember, but the memory changes as time passes and WE change.
This episode deals, in many ways, with the role memories play in our lives. Bill's own acceptance of her death, along with her understanding that it is memories that make up who she really is, beyond her physical traits and biological characteristics has profound significance in the way the writers wanted us to perceive regeneration. The memories stay, so you are still YOU even if you die. She insists upon it, and through The Doctor's acceptance of memories as having eternal value, he is able to let go and allow himself to regenerate.
Our turn now
"Be kind," The 12th Doctor says in his final speech on the TARDIS. Perhaps more than ever, this line is directed at the audience watching The Doctor regenerate and plunge into a new era of change in gender perceptions and biases.
Will she crash? Will she be saved by a TARDIS full of bras? Is she still married to River even if the ring slips off? I can't wait to find out!
-=-=-=-
Notes: All images are property of their rightful owners and I intend no infringement. Also, bowties are cool.
I am a huge Doctor Who fan and well anything science fiction really and a lot of people reacted to the change negatively but I don't see any problem.
As @geekorner mentioned a lot of beloved characters in Marvel also experienced gender swaps and it was also perceived negatively but to me the change was good in the story arc. It even made Thor odinson more interesting as well in his unworthy arc.
Well going back to Doctor Who we had so many unforgettable versions of him like David Tennant who was an absolute delight as the Purple Man in Jessica Jones and I am waiting for his rendition of Crowley in Good Omens.
There is no reason I see that the Good doctor can't be a woman. Time will tell if it will be a good fit but to me I like it. Maybe we'll ll have in the future more diverse iterations of Doctor Who.
I wait as well and will support a show that I have watched for so long.
I've lectured about Doctor Who at local science fiction conventions. Back in the summer when the new Doctor was revealed, my only regret is not filming my reaction. A female Doctor is an achievement for us as such an old fandom. And a test.
"Conceived in the time when women were objectified and underestimated" implying that's no longer the case?
Lovely read regardless :)
Good point. I watched a show recently about sexism in the 70s and kept wondering why they were implying the same thing.
I've also written a post on gender in Doctor Who
I have more problems with The Doctor being young then with "him" being a woman (a who-man? Sorry.)
You know, it's just the old wise white beard thingy.
W(h)oman. I love it. <3
Also, agism and gender bias come from the same place. Gender does not make a rolemodel, and neither does facial hair, IMHO.
But I like my stereotypes!
LOL
Fine, I'll grow a beard! :P
Implying you are old and wise? :D
No, but I would like to have some way to imply that!
Wonderful write-up @techslut. This is especially great:
So the goal here isn't to repress the old behaviors of past, but rather to deal with them by overcoming our shame and awkwardness, coming to a point where we can laugh about it instead of judging one another and our past selves.
I think it's difficult in these times to remember that the folks of the past were a result of their surroundings. Culture is influential. We are evolving to see many things as downright wrong that used to be acceptable even to most women (sadly.) I'm glad that these views are changing so drastically now, but I also don't want to have to look back with disgust and anger at every man who didn't "get it" when practically no one got it.
Much better to be looking forward and celebrating the victories of today, like Jodie Whittaker, whose announcement as the new Doctor caused my 11-year-old daughter to squeal with delight in a pitch never before or since heard on earth. Like Jodie Whittaker, who is a stellar actress and will likely be a fantastic Doctor regardless of gender.
I never even heard of that series, but I really enjoyed to read your educated analysis of that episode - It's really nice to see that popular tv shows decide to use their tools to express opinions and try to make people consider them, actually - it might even be be much helpful than lectures and books about the topic. we learn last week that the story of Angelina Jolie and her surgery after finding she carries the BRCA1 gene made much more impact than any other things on woman's test rates - it might be the case with feminism and this episode also. I just hope that the series will stay fun and that changes that have a moral goal will not hurt the quality and authenticity of the series - I guess there is no reason to worry about such scenario though, it's unlikely.
even if thaat apparently simple message will get to some people - "be nice", than that episode did it part :)
edit: it really remains me of the idea of Reincarnation in Judaism. I guess it a common theme in other religions as well :)
את כותבת נפלא, נהנתי!
Loved your post and your points! I think that once the first season will be over, most will love her but some will just dislike her out of principle.
It seems to me the show has been foreshadowing the gender swap for a long time -- way back in "The Doctor's Wife" (Season 6 Episode 4), they discuss the fact that Time Lords can regenerate as Time Ladies.
And way, way back in "Journey's End" (Season 4, Episode 13), we see how awesome a female Doctor could be when Donna becomes "Doctor Donna."
I'm excited to see what the new Doctor is like, as I always am at this point in "The Regeneration Cycle."
But, man, her wedding ring slipping off! My heart lurched a little bit when that happened. I took it as a symbol for saying that relationship is over, but I hope they resolve that idea more clearly.
Great article! I look forward to seeing more of your posts :)
Thank you! My hope for a female Doctor was reborn with Missy. If the Master can regenerate into a woman, then the Doctor will too, at some point.
Also:
Of course! How could I forget Missy?! Yet another example of how this seems like it's been a long time coming. Are people actually surprised that the Doctor regenerated as a woman?
happy Christmas :)
I am a fan of Fringe .But doctor who also has a very nice
I haven't seen any of the new doctor who yet, but it doesn't make any difference what sex or age the doctor is, as long as it entertaining.
The concept of time travel has always been interesting to me and these show's stimulate the imagination.
I look forward to seeing the new series (when I can get around to it).
Cheers for the interesting read. Happy new year!!
Thank you! <3