This really isn't an "objective" look as there are several statements that simply ooze subjectivity and perspective throughout the post. While I get where you are coming from, it is sometimes very hard to removes one's own narrative from a more unbiased picture.

There are words highlighted that seem to imply that an action that DLive took is less than ideal or unfitting within some ideal moral structure that appears to come from a subjective point of view rather than an objective one. I'm not condoning their behavior by any means, but I fail to see a significant enough argument to indicate that they did anything "objectively" wrong.

Granted you do support your arguments which is more than most users have done in addressing this issue, that doesn't mean that the overall point that you are trying to make is "objective". The post seems to suggest underneath that projects on the blockchain should behave in a certain way and that others should also use their stake accordingly in a certain way. While I can agree with the sentiment, you never really make an "objective" argument in support of this implicit desired behavior and social contract that Steemians should abide by.

That is not to say that this post was well-written or well-researched. But the slant of the post is apparent and to call this perspective "objective" is rather disingenuous.