You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why We (Don't)

in #discussion7 years ago

There is nothing of the photographic evidence and tv transmissions that couldn't have been faked.
(I have heard government do this from time to time, apparently, to spin a narrative.)

There are quite a few anomalies, like the lack of blast patterns under the moon landing rocket thingy - that's a doozy. I cannot explain that one. How do you explain that one?) - based on there own photographic evidence.

The lack of response and accuracy from the astronauts is also very suspicious, and the threats and violence to journalists asking awkward questions, does not exactly give a positive angle on them ever being there..

...and then there are the pesky van allens, which from how I understand it, could not have been neutralized with the thickness of the rocket walls and materials used ect.

I don't really know massive amounts about it, but the more I discover, the more suspicious I become of it ever happening...

There are hundreds of anomalies with the mars thingy too. (like my use of technical terms? lol)