Thank you for pointing this out. In my initial considerations for my discussion post, I was basically looking at an incredibly low number of an hourly rate to base about 3 years of backpay on. I don't like the idea of backpay proposals, but I also don't really believe in charging before I do the work and ideally plan to go for years doing as much as possible for free while evaluating along the way. That being said, this proposal has the additional budget rolled in, which I think is too problematic for a number of reasons, which is why I asked for it to be reduced or removed~