The part on the Internet Bill of Rights needs clarification. Q mentioned IBOR because our information war is currently being censored without it. The IBOR is needed because the first amendment does not currently apply to corporations’ community standards.
The first amendment clearly states “Congress shall make no law...” A1 prevents the GOVERNMENT from passing laws that infringe on our right to free speech. As much as I wish it did, this does NOT apply to the right of companies to institute their own community standards. This is why we really need IBOR.
IBOR would effectively deem social media sites to be like utility companies; the phone company can’t cut your service if they don’t like what you’re saying, because they are a utility. Twitter, however, can drop anyone for any reason, because they are not considered a utility and A1 only applies to infringement by government laws.
Why are you skeptical of IBOR? I honestly want to know what you have against this bill. If you are going to make a stand against a valuable tool for the Alliance, and the effective freedom of speech needed to bring about the Great Awakening, I want to know what evidence you have to support this action.
You mentioned that att supports it. Guilt by association? Seriously? (Hitler was a vegan; is than a valid argument against veganism? No.). Att obviously sees the writing on the wall and they care about their image/PR.
Please take a second look at IBOR, or show us something in the bill that is anything but helpful to the cause.
In closing, just because I disagree on this doesn’t mean I don’t love you and appreciate everything you do. I’m just trying to help.
Hi @c-change, I am completely open to healthy discussion-- that is the point of A1!
I support breaking up FB, Google, YT with anti-trust legislation, rather than promoting a regulatory bill, which IS NOT necessary for freedom of speech on social media platforms. Anyone who sends a lawyer's statement to YT, instantly gets their channel put back up, bc they have no true legal means of censoring based on supposed community guidelines. It is a lie and a sham. We need to break up these corporate monopolies rather than have new legislation to separate our 1st Am rights from our activity on the internet.
What evidence do you have that this IBOR will be beneficial? That it won't be harmful to our already given 1st Am right? That it won't grant AT&T the "right" to fry us with 5G?
Today, an important clause in the Omnibus Bill that was signed by Trump, pretty much nullifies our 4th amendment right to privacy. This is because 5G will make privacy impossible.
The Hitler vegan thing is really a goofy comparison! No offense! To NOT grock the massive power of At&t over the last century in breaching our rights to free speech and privacy is naive in the very least. This company is Rothschild-sized powerful.
If someone can show me just how this IBOR would be a necessary step to the accomplishment of #STORM, great! I am all ears!