Please note this is just my interpretation of the guidelines. Other reviewers may disagree - some of my submissions are disapproved too - so don't blame me if your posts are disapproved on my recommendations :) This is for Curie's curators.
Generally, as a curator, I look for engaging posts that I feel add value to Steem in some way. I particularly seek posts which are sure to be popular on Steem - if only they were discovered.
New and verified authors only, who have been persistent without much success. Brand new authors who have one or two posts without verification do not qualify.
Look out for authors who have made a good few posts, let's say 3 or 4. Those who have engaged with the community actively, making valuable comments on other people's posts etc. Someone new, who is into the community, but hasn't quite been discovered yet.
General guideline for "new author" would be between 27 Reputation and 52 Reputation.
Pretty obvious. Note that you can post by authors up to 52.9 Rep (which still says 52 on Steemit), but not 53.
Posts must be more than 150 minutes old, but less than 24 hours,
Also pretty obvious.
with maximum $1 pending payout.
The pending payout of the post at time of submission must be $1 or less. This is a pretty common mistake, as the submission platform doesn't enforce a hard limit.
A single author may be upvoted only once in 2 days or twice a week.
Look back through the author's profile, if they have a vote by @curie on any post that is within 48 hours from the time of post creation of the post you're submitting, pass on it. For example, if a post you're submitting was made on 31st July 12:11 PM, and @curie voted on a post made on 29th July 8:45 PM, best to pass on it.
Also, try to avoid authors who are writing a series or worse, trying to milk the same topic - Curie is unlikely to vote on all parts from the same series, or a repetitive topic.
Only original content.
Original content, created by the author of the post.
Articles, art, poetry, videos, recipes, etc. that appear first on Steemit.
Older reposts do not qualify. For example, an author may repost a blog from 2012, or a video from April 2017, etc. Make sure it's something new and fresh made for Steemit, within the last few days.
Please make sure sources are linked properly
Particularly for factual posts, citing sources is important.
check for plagiarism before posting here.
You can use tools like Quetext, Grammarly, Plagtracker, etc. There are plenty of options! Often, a quick Google search is enough to find a duplicate. Be wary if the English sounds funny - it might have been translated from a different language.
No Steemit-related, photography, travel, religious, introduceyourself or political posts.
Anything to do with Steemit or Steem, avoid. Religious or political posts, too. Political posts might be OK if they are historical or objective, but no political rants please.
For photography, this refers to posts which are explicitly to show off the photographs. Posts that use photographs to enhance or aid a different narrative are OK.
Same with travel, if it's the traditional travel post with pictures and sharing the author's experience, best to pass. However, it could be a travel post with a twist - maybe a video, maybe documenting an event etc. Those might be approved.
English posts only.
Some posts are bilingual. Be careful about those - they may not be approved unless the post is exceptional and the translation is original.
Finally, quality is subjective, but the curation score lists have proven time and again that this is absolutely a skill that can be learned. Pay attention to the type of posts @curie is resteeming, and it's not all that difficult to get a dozens of approvals and hundreds of Steem in finder's fee per week.
These are just guidelines, and exceptional posts are sometimes approved even if they don't meet the guidelines exactly. It depends on how high your CS is. If your submission limit is only 2, it's best to only submit sure-shot posts. If your submission limit is 10, I'd once again be wary. But if you have unlimited submissions, and you're doing really well for the week with 100% approval rate, it might be worth a gamble.
Hope this helps!
Some more official pointers, though this is from a long time ago.
This is pretty much how I have approached Curie recently. I got in just in time, with two approved submissions over the last two weeks.
It feels like "you know it when you see it." The post will look good, it's the right reputation and less than $1 payout, and it's within the 150 minutes - 24 hours time zone... and BOOM! You submit that to Curie, and it gets upvoted, and everybody wins.
Seems like y'all have the same purpose as us @ocd . That's amazing keep doing great things buddy :) Community needs as much help as it can get
Thank a lot @liberosist for the information related to project curie. This is applicable to authors who are talented and hard working, bringing some real quality & originality on steemit. And it indeed works for them. But once a user gets past the reputation level of 52, all of a sudden their posts start to go unnoticed. Do you follow any curation guild yourself to look and curate quality content.
BTW wanted to also thank you for upvoting my post from yesterday, due to which I got about 15 more upvotes, under your trail I reckon. 😊✌️
Recommending how to curate is cool, but existing curators should know what they're doing and Curie's closed for new curators, so who's this post aimed at..? :)
Sorry, that sounds a little combative, not meant to be. But if Curie's closed to new curators, then only established curators are able to use the service and generate income. Meaning that the purpose of Curie is merely a cash-cow for established steemians, not the means to distribute wealth that, as I read it, Curie was intended to be.
I appreciate the difficulties you have been having, as I can well imagine the kind of sub-par submissions you've been getting, and that there's a limit to Curie members' time for going through submissions, so I have every sympathy for your predicament. Perhaps a vetting system for new curators, allowing current curators to recommend new ones? Not sure how that would work practically speaking, but seems to me something is required if Curie's going to continue, as without some churn in curators it will end up inactive.
Yes, this is exactly what is happening. Existing curators will even paid to recommend great new curators. More details in today's Curie Weekly Update, but you can find out some hints if you follow #curie. (on steemit.chat)
Ah, cool, good to know. I started following the steemit chat this morning - this week's steemit task was to get involved with Curie! Should have done it a couple of weeks ago, ah well :-P
Thanks for the reply and the ongoing updates, much appreciated
I tried doing this for a while and a few of mine were accepted..... but then they started getting disapproved over and over again. Eventually I had to give it up. It is pretty hard to get it right.
Hi, so I'm not sure I understand how curie works. But since you have a good reputation as a curator, I thought I will approach you to help. I am not asking you to upvote or resteemed my posts, but I would genuinely appreciate if you could tell me honestly how I can improve my posts. I am new at this, and am not being able to attract a lot of readers. I would be very grateful if you could read some of my work and tell me what you think.
very interesting, I was selected Once by curie There is no better way to help new arrivals steemit.
Thanks to curie and to all the reviewers
good continuation
Thank you. Your guide was very useful and informative for me.
Really clean description of what a good content is intended to be.
Hello @liberosist and thanks for this guidelines. I try to register in streemian.com. com but it tells me "Steem account doesn't exist".
I specified my username here and my e-mail address. But not sure about what password I have to use ? Thank you for making this clear.