I have seen several comments about him shaming people. That is not what he is doing. He is simply asking people to think about supporting a person that has supported them. What he has done is shown people that he supports @curie. That he thinks they are a good witness. There are several people who on there blog resteem or blog about the witnesses they support. He has not asked anyone to Blindly follow anyone. He has provided the links to for individuals to make there own choice. I have proxied my witness vote to Asher, you have proxied your vote to someone. I proxied because I did not have the time or energy to search for 30 witnesses, I got up to I think 17, before proxying my vote.

Voting for witnesses is a CHOICE, and people shouldn't be guilted and shamed into voting for a witness. That is unethical.

He has not shamed anyone, he has sent out a request, "a request" for those individuals on the list to consider voting for @curie. There is absolutely nothing unethical about what he has done. It is not unethical to ask people to think about something. He has done each and everyone on that list a huge service. he has Let all of us know, here are the people that have been curried, and everyone knows that to be curried knows that person has some QUALITY content to look through. If you think his asking you to change your mind or to investigate @curie as a witness, while showing me a shit load of quality content providers is unethical.....I just don't know what else to say.