You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Some additional thoughts on @reward.app after the announcement

in #curation4 years ago

Can you explain to a “less savvy” person like me; how is this different from likwid? Except that ~4% default “curator” reward, which can be potentially modified. My main concern is abuse. Another simple way to get rewards out faster.

Sort:  

I'm pretty sure I'm as less savvy as you. :D

but the liquid post rewards are just an extra thing really, I mean if the community prefers to receive them the way they get them now that's doable as well, same goes for both authors and curators. For curators getting liquid rewards we think it could be a cool experiment as @cardboard mentioned in his post so they wouldn't need to power down if they would like to have some extra liquids around for tipping, investing in tokens/games/etc.

But if authors sets beneficiary, then sets the reward to curators to zero, it becomes likwid.... right?

Lower fee as far as I know but yes.

Should that be allowed as an option?

If the author rewards go out as liquid? Yeah we can give people options.