I'm afraid not a slam dunk at all, if I were to give you a link back it would be this one https://respectfulinsolence.com/2014/08/28/a-bad-day-for-antivaccinationists-a-retraction-and-the-cdc-whistleblower-issues-a-statement/
However, that is a lot of data right there, let me sum up by saying that this man is a fantasist, and absolutely zero evidence has been brought forward to support his claims, however his lies have fulled the conspiracy theories.
Next, Andrew Wakefield was bankrolled by a rival drug company making an MMR substitute; his original data was taken from a poll with 12 sets of parents, 8 of whom said that they thought that maybe their children had developed autism after vaccination.
These people have been utterly discredited, however most people operate on the 'no smoke without fire' premise, so there must be something in it.
Like I said above, there have been multi-decade long studies, and meta analyses, comparisons, retesting and so on, done by dozens and dozens of different organisations, universities, health organisations, governments, and so on. Not one single link has ever been found.
That for me is overwhelming evidence, and it would take pretty extraordinary evidence to prove otherwise.
Great comment by the way, good to see the debate is alive and kicking! :-)