You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The battle for the name "Bitcoin" escalates / IOTA joins MOBI; Start of IOTA Ecosystem

in #cryptocurrency6 years ago (edited)

Ver is a con artist and has a cult following nothing you can do to make them see sense.

In the general sense that you imply here, simply not true.

  1. Roger may not have the strongest arguments, but he's not actively trying to deceive other people as much as he can be moody and not always fully honest with himself in argumentative situations.

  2. Many in the BCH camp are criticizing Roger both privately and publicly. Currently there is even a notable split in the BCH community over whether labeling Bitcoin Cash "Bitcoin", with or without "BCH" behind it, is fraudulent or not. Even if I don't usually agree with him, in this case I don't think it was fraud.

Since the very beginning, people like "the evil miner" Jihan Wu has been publicly opposed to calling Bitcoin Cash anything but "Bitcoin Cash", restating this publicly a couple times. So not even the supposed pumpers in this group are not consistently agreeing.

Sort:  

The evil miner he is trying to make money just like Lord roger but he is evil and Rogers the ones that dealt with him but he isn't evil. If one is then the other must be. When has an angel ever worked with the devil. Ok his not a con artist but he is just as a big if not bigger cunt as Wu

This may surprise you, but I have perhaps more respect for Jihan than I have for Roger. Jihan actually has fairly well thought out opinions and is usually a very level headed guy. Calling him a cunt for creating and mining using the best possible hardware and wanting to support competing chains is a little low imo.

Calling him evil is a bit lower imo

Sure, but I'm also remarking on your use of language. "Cunt" is inprecise smear and is quite frankly what I'd expect to hear from an adolescent. In that sense I consider it lower.