i know , you're not against each other but i think that one solution caped at 500m $ is better than 5 at 100m $ ,if you see what i mean
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
i know , you're not against each other but i think that one solution caped at 500m $ is better than 5 at 100m $ ,if you see what i mean
If one could provide for every need would be amazing but data storage is a very broad area with technogly varying that even further.
There are many demographics such as finance, big data, consumer to name a few, with advancements in technology increasing the diversity and requiring more specialization.
Having multiples in the same area would only hasten the development and innovation due to competition and i dont think they would damage each other rather the current big players.
yeah you got an interresting point :D