They pull their data from public sites such as github. So, in theory, if a company has a low ranking yet their github is very active one could cry foul on the ranking. It is semi transparent.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
They pull their data from public sites such as github. So, in theory, if a company has a low ranking yet their github is very active one could cry foul on the ranking. It is semi transparent.
I don't think it will be relied on enough to have as much of an impact as you are implying.
I suggest you do little research on who are the guys behind 'Flipside Crypto' (that is the company providing the ratings) and who are they connected to ...
it is a huge red flag !
Why is that? They state the majority of the info they use to come up with these ratings comes from github and other public sites.
What 'they state' is irrelevant . Go check their team individually . Go check background of their CEO , what he does besides 'Flipside Crypto' . These people have ZERO credibility to rate any crypto project , their background is mainly in marketing and selling snake oil ...
While that may be true, if a coin's ranking doesn't match up with the activity that is happening on their github repository, one can cry foul. There is at least some transparency to these things...
I am going to get some snake oil , looks like you would be a good customer ;-)