What you say would be correct if all votes were equal. They are not. The value of the vote is based on the amount of steem power you have. So if you take a look at Haejin's contributions, you will see a vastly disproportionate amount of rewards coming from two individuals, Ranchrelaxo and Haejin himself.

So it is not a situation in which the COMMUNITY is causing his financial success but instead, a single individual and himself. This creates a situation in which people with a lot of wealth can simply come in and buy the pot. This exact situation was described in the Steem whitepaper.

So to answer your question, no. Your vote and hundreds of votes just like yours are not really contributing factors to this controversy. Instead, it is the votes from a single individual totaling up to $3600 daily and self-votes combined with the amounts of posts per day are the issue.