Crowdini asks you 1 question a day. It takes 10 seconds to play and you get paid SBD
for voting. Check out yesterday’s results!
Should there be a site that allows people to rate media members for how credible their content is?
No (7%)Yes (92%)
Note: We give all voters the option to answer “Why did you choose this answer?” after voting. All comments made at Crowdini.com are shown below as comments to this post. I hope you will respond and debate these results in the comments.
Current Game
- Game: May Gray
- Length: May 21, 2018 - Jun 03, 2018
- Prize Pool: 45.0 SBD
- Points: Percentage System (see How to )
- Referrals: 5 points for each of the referrer and referred players. Max 25 points (see How to for what is needed to get a referral)
- Bonus: 100 points. If a question is labeled Bonus the players who choose the answer that actually happens will earn an extra 100 points.
-
Prizes:
(All prizes paid in SBD)
- First Prize - 50% of the prize pool
- Second Prize - 25% of the prize pool
- Third Prize - 15% of the prize pool
-
100% Participation Prize
- 10% of the prize pool split between:
- All players who voted in every question in the game and upvoted all results posts on Steemit for the game within the first 24 hours of the post publishing.
- If this is your first game you will be eligible if you vote in every question from the day you sign up to the end of the game and have upvoted all the results posts on Steemit starting from the day you joined.
- First, Second and Third place winners not eligible for 100% Prize.
What is Crowdini?
Crowdini is a question and answer game. We ask you to answer one question a day and give you points based on how your answer compares to the majority answer.
We have incorporated Steemit in a new innovative way. Read more about Crowdini and how we have incorporated Steemit in our intro post here.
At the end of the game the top 3 in points split 90% of the prize pool and all other players who voted on every question for that game will split 10% of the prize pool.
It is designed to be something you can do in a few seconds a day but hopefully sparks conversation and thought.
Sign up and play today at Crowdini.com .
I answered
Yes
It should be based off real fact checking. Not like Yelp where any idiot can leave a bad review for some imagined slight.
I answered
No
the average person has no basis for knowing how credible media reporting is. THat would be like allowing the public to determine how credible scientific findings are. What would their ratings be based on? This is yet another attempt to demonize the free press and it is both disgusting and dangerous. It is the first step towards the destruction of a free press. "Freedom of conscience, of education, of speech, of assembly are among the very fundamentals of democracy and all of them would be nullified should freedom of the press ever be successfully challenged." -FDR
I answered
No
i feel like review systems are mostly worthless now. they are spammed by bots and scorned lovers.
I answered
Yes
there are too many fake news, so maybe this will be something to lower such amount of fake news... maybe
I answered
Yes
Yes to much fake news
I answered
Yes
I don't trust a single word coming from ABC, CBS, or NBC news reporters. No accountability for anything they say! 🖕
I answered
Yes
It would need a tight system, so that bots and trolls don't overwhelm amazing reporters. Identification verification would be nice.
I answered
Yes
Then there's got to be another site to rate THAT site on its credibility.
I answered
Yes
How do we control how credible the ratings would be?
See @foomandr's comment. :)
I answered
Yes
I can't see how it would hurt, could only help.
I answered
Yes
It would be a good attempt to inform others of what they may not know about the media but I can see it being very politically divisive.
I answered
Yes
Sure, why not. But I wouldn't expect it to be very reliable, given how politically biased so many people are nowadays.
I answered
Yes
It needs a lot of norms and standards to make a proper review,,,