So funny and obvious now, once you know how to look. As regards the coink-e-dink in daisychain fashion on that particular / specific number of note, here are some more headlines featuring the same count. No shocker there.

March 2:

• Coronavirus, 33 risposte per 33 domande - Sky TG24 (Italy)

• Coronavirus: Only 1 in 33 infections are reported as COVID19 expert warns of hidden figure

• TWICE’s Nayeon donates £33k to coronavirus relief efforts in South Korea

March 3:

• Coronavirus in Canada: Latest timeline of 33 COVID-19 cases

• Coronavirus: 33 suspected cases all test negative - GHS Boss (Ghana)

• Australia Confirms 33 Coronavirus Cases, Over 90,000 Affected Globally

• Aggiornamento Coronavirus: 33 casi positivi a Modena (Italy)

March 4:

• Coronavirus : 33 cas potentiels sont analysés au Québec (Canada)

• Additional Coronavirus Death Reported in S. Korea, Raising Death Toll to 33

• Ya son 33 los casos sospechosos por coronavirus que analizó el Malbrán, cuatro de ellos en el día de hoy (Argentina)

• Coronavirus: 33 Fragen, die sich jeder Unternehmer jetzt stellen sollte (Germany)

March 5:

• Algebris Offices Operating at 33% Capacity Amid Coronavirus

• Un alemán de 33 años, posible 'paciente 0' de coronavirus en Europa (Germany / Spain site)

• With 33 in isolation, a look at how Delhi is battling coronavirus crisis (India)

March 6:

• New York coronavirus cases increase to 33

• 33 EMU students and 2 faculty members now self-quarantined after returning from study abroad trip in Italy

• Coronavirus: 33 casi in Ticino, stretta sulle manifestazioni (Switzerland)

March 7:

• Pregnant woman, 33, tests positive for coronavirus in Erbil (Kurdistan)

• Egypt confirms 33 new cases of coronavirus on Nile cruise ship

• Coronavirus: Two more confirmed cases in Punjab; number rises to 33 in India

We're not even looking at article main body text here (many of which have their own such numerical references embedded therein, e.g., a 33 year-old man, or a budget of $33 Billion), so much as just headlines to make the point.

Note how one rarely sees anywhere near the mention of similar numbers (e.g., 31, 32, 34, 35), or round numbers on the same scale (i.e. 30, 40), as opposed to this highly specific one. This must all just be random ... naturally, and means absolutely nothing whatsoever.