I could see why that would be a good idea and would invoke more creativity, but then I could see why that would also be a bad idea.
From a consumer standpoint, that would be like paying 3 designers and only walking away with 1 design. On top of that, we may not even get 3 entries. 50 SBD is a high reward considering the potential for SBD. Ultimately I think having only 1 winner will filter out people only in it for money and find people who are really passionate about their work.
I could see why that would be a good idea and would invoke more creativity, but then I could see why that would also be a bad idea.
From a consumer standpoint, that would be like paying 3 designers and only walking away with 1 design. On top of that, we may not even get 3 entries. 50 SBD is a high reward considering the potential for SBD. Ultimately I think having only 1 winner will filter out people only in it for money and find people who are really passionate about their work.
Your contest, your rules :) People are still join mostly for the reward.
You can do something like 40,7,3 :)
Hmmm. Perhaps I'll switch it up! Thanks!
yaaay :) Winner will now hate me for "giving" his 10SBD to others :D :D D hehe
😂😂
I guess getting 7 instead of 0 is better than getting 50 instead of 40.
😎
You are right @andrejcibik. i agree withyou...
It has been adjusted.