I am not questioning the fact that it's not original content, people don't have to read it or upvote it, i'm just saying that i don't mind seeing Zh articles "resteemed" here.
I agree that it would be better received if the re-post was accompanied with some thoughtful and penetrating analysis -- but maybe that's what the comments are for.
Cheers @talltim!
I think it matters that he doesn't have any permission from the site itself, or the authors he is copying from. Just because its convenient, doesn't mean its ethical.
If he declined the payout, that would change things - but he hasn't, ever. Its clearly a ploy to use the brand identity of a site to reap benefits from the reward pool. I don't support that, at all.
Well he does advertise for the site... i'm sure Tyler would be thrilled.
But i understand your point, and accept its validity, even if i don't agree.
Cheers talltim!