I recall an interview with Robert Anton Wilson where he mentioned that Mae Brussell was one of the original authorities on conspiracies in the media. He quotes her work often but I never actually saw or heard any of it. Thanks for sending this. Not nearly enough people discussing these things intelligently. I don't have a problem with Aquino or anyone else choosing a Luciferian icon or deity to worship, freely. It's the notion that it's so difficult to believe they are real, that people allow them to get away with anything because, "who would they be that obvious?"...right? They use that, some of the dark workers, to get away with things. These people take 'slight-of-hand-magick' to the Defense Industry. It gets integrated into their theology and filters down. There are some pretty clear signs that Aquino had a negative energetic impact on pockets of the US Army PSYOPS division. These people take oaths that supersede their loyalty to the United States and thus, can create 'national security' issues. It doesn't matter if that oath is Knights of Malta or Church of Satan, if you agree to serve those 'brotherhoods' or 'orders' before the US, but you represent the US militarily....how is that not considered a national security issue in and of itself? I know this is a dicey issue and one could make the same claims about all faiths in relation to public service. But I'm seeing a very distinct thread, consistently, within government services where we are told to just accept these people are 'doing good' on faith alone. Despite all the evidence. If you understand how people engaged in PSYOPS or this form of Satan Worship think, you'll know, deception and manipulation of the public trust is a core aspect of their belief system. People can maintain their belief systems but we need to have a questionnaire attached to military service where people are asked, under oath, point blank...will you honor your commitment to the US and the world population BEFORE you honor those to the Church or Satan, Temple of Set or Catholic Church (or whatever)...you see? People need to be asked, point blank, if it comes down to the 'the end'...where is your loyalty? If it's not with the people of the US, who you are told to defend above all else, then you are committing some form of treason. Our problem is that this treason has become the norm and anyone pointing it out, tends to be targeted.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
There is a lot of Mae Brussell to be found on youtube. I have also found so much in torrents, that I have not listened to it all yet. She had this huge system of filing cabinets to keep track of all her research, computers not being nearly as powerful then, and she being so busy researching. She is still in the top ten conspiracy researchers, ever. Eustace Mullins is another, mostly unknown, but amazing source of knowledge.
The question of loyalties is a difficult one, and how to be certain of the answer. Satanists worship the self, and not actually satan. In Islam it is okay to lie to non-believers, so you can never be sure. A Christian's loyalty is always to Jesus, first, so how they will respond when things come down to the wire depends on individual understanding of their hierarchy of loyalties. If you factor into that, unlawful orders, the whole thing gets even more messy. I prefer to deal with people on an individual basis, and trust but verify until they give me evidence to not trust them. This approach would be very difficult, if not impossible, for large organizations, and definitely not workable for a military, during war.