Theory of conspiracy: did we really walk on the moon?

Hi friends, I hope you're fine?

After talking about the Illuminati conspiracy theory (https://steemit.com/secret/@lndesta120282/the-illuminati), Zone 51 (https://steemit.com/ufo/@lndesta120282/the-area-51) and Roswell case (https://steemit.com/ufo/@lndesta120282/the-roswell-case), I'm going to talk to you today about conspiracy theory versus whether or not no man to walk on the moon.

(Picture source)
I will not give you the answer of course, I do not know it, to each one to make his opinion on the facts which will be evoked below.

On July 20, 1969, the man walked on the moon, many people believed it, the majority even but it is without counting on the specialists of the theories of the plot which did not see this event of the same eye as most people…

Indeed, they noticed strange facts that for them, prove that all this is actually a hoax ...

Facts

The flag

What first struck the conspiracy specialists and pushed them to investigate deeply was the flag.
Indeed, the flag that for the first time and in front of millions of viewers, Neil Armstrong has planted on the moon, floats.

It is very strange because without atmosphere the flag should be motionless and not warp as it would on the Earth with the influence of the wind.
Some who are against this conspiracy theory say that the flag does not move. It is actually wrinkled because it has been folded for the journey and so what we see is the folds that were made on the flag.
When we look at it, it looks like it's floating and not just crumpled ...

Photos and videos

NASA and Kodak, the company that won the contract to supply the films that served to cover the event, say that no external sources of artificial light or flash were brought to the moon. Nevertheless, we have been shown many pictures where the shadows have several directions. Indeed, normally, natural light, emitted by the sun, always sends the shadows in the same direction whereas in the photos of Nasa, the shadows are of different sizes and go in different directions.

The only scientific explanation is the use of artificial light.

Cameras that were brought into the mission were also equipped with a cross called reticle, to aim when we take pictures and strange, objects appear in front.

The crosshairs are the small crosses that can be seen in the photos, a marking system built into the cameras, and on some shots, the small crosses seem hidden by objects as if they were added on top.

A strange fact also concerning a cliché is the photo of a stone on the ground where we can see the letter C engraved on it, as in a cinema decoration where the objects carry marks so that the technicians can know or put them in the decoration ...

The mountain backgrounds in the background are also the same in totally different shots. The photos of the lunar sky also show no star, weird. While during other missions Apollo, we can see on stars on clichés like Venus for example.

The quality of the photos is too beautiful, indeed, when one travels in space, one is subjected to solar radiations and logically these radiations should have damaged the images, which was not the case.
The devices themselves, which are essentially made of plastic, have strangely resisted both hot and cold extremes of space.

Compared to the videos, there is something strange too, indeed, when we observe the takeoff of the lunar module, first, there is no smoke that emerge boosters, or even flames, or of dust that flies away. And secondly, if we observe the video we can see the takeoff of the lunar module as if we had abandoned one of the astronauts on the spot so he can film the departure, poor man; o)

What is also strange is that they did not even take advantage of their situation to offer us a video that would have shown us a film that would start from the moon's floor to the sky and the Earth as often seen in the movies, as in Apollo 13 for example with Tom Hanks, one of my favorite movies.

On some videos we can see the faces of the astronauts, their expressions and their eyes and there we have the right to wonder if it is the looks of heroes returned from a dangerous but extraordinary and formidable space mission or if they are the eyes of people who would have been hired to play a role to cover a huge lie and who would tell us that they are ashamed to participate in this deception but that they certainly do so for good reasons that are their own, financial maybe ...

Some conspiracy specialists say the images we saw were shot in the studio by Stanley Kubrick.

(Video source)

Weightlessness

On the moon, weightlessness is 6 times less than on the earth. So, an astronaut who weighs 120 kilos with his equipment would weigh only 20 kilos on the moon.

Scientists have calculated that a man on the moon could leap 2 meters high without difficulty while on the NASA images, the astronaut jumps just 30 centimeters high.

There is also no trace of a lunar crater while the lunar module weighs several tons. In this mission, there is no trace of a possible hole made by the craft during its moon landing.

Sounds

Apparently, some of the sounds heard in the videos are very strange, even unnatural, like those in the film of the landing on the moon.

Goal

Why such a plot will you tell me? Why so much energy spent and lies?

As for most of this kind of questions, for the money of course!

Some countries, the Americans and the Russians in particular, receive enormous budgets, astronomical sums destined to conquer space.

By conquering space, it gives the people a sense of pride in having accomplished a technological miracle, and that makes them proud of their country and especially of their government.

President Jonhson once said, "Whoever controls space controls the world".

It also says: "From space, the masters of infinity would have the power to control the earth's weather, to cause drought and flood, to change the tides and raise the levels of the sea, to divert the gulf stream and change temperate climates to frigid. "

To summarize, some conspiracy specialists say that the Americans actually walked on the moon in 1969 but it was not the first time.

Indeed, some say that Germans already have a base on the moon since the 50s.

What they would then have found on the moon remained top secret and since then they have been ordered never to return…

(Text source)

In fact, if there is one thing that bothers me that makes me wonder why, then right now we have a lot of new technologies, plus the ones we do not know about. existence surely used by our armies, we have never returned to the moon? It's still pretty strange, is not it?