The Greatest Conspiracy

in #conspiracy8 years ago (edited)




Start a conversation about politics, religion or even the general state of reality and at some point a conspiracy theory will pop-up; vaccines, GMO’s, NSA, chemtrails, reptilians—heck, even movie concepts like The Matrix can fixate a mind into a point of no return. Undoubtedly Big Pharma, the FIAT Stock Exchange network, large corporations or even cryptocurrency exchanges try to control the strings one way or another because of their position. Here is the thing though; nobody truly controls anything. Many try to control the world one way or another but it never goes exactly as planned.

If we interview the biggest world influencers, even dictators, they would sincerely say that they only dreamt of a better world. Sure, everyone likes to run things once in awhile, but overall they would prefer to make people happy by setting those around them free. At some point though, things always go the wrong way. Further actions to correct calamities often deteriorate a situation, spiraling into more unpleasantries. The end image will eventually reach us, the unsuspecting viewer, but we would have already lost the grander perspective of things—and this is how conspiracies are born.

All the aforementioned “big guys” at some point or another desired profit. No surprise here since we all do what we do because of capital—whether that is financial, intellectual or social. However, interests and market valuations disperse pretty rapidly in our dynamic market. For example, Big Pharma companies compete with each other, often to death. In an attempt to gain an edge over the other they often produce hasty results or push medical products that are not properly tested for the general public. In other words the market forces them to continually run on a Beta version rather than anything “official”. Thing is, the general public don’t see it this way. Desperate for an explanation, the masses will tie the outcomes to elaborate conspiracy theories, thus justifying their biggest worries.

This is why massively over-generalised end-time scenarios like “population control”, “illuminati” and “new world order” are so popular. Keep in mind that very few humans accept responsibility for their actions. We would rather blame our shortcomings or ignorance to something vague, existing somehwere “out there”. Most religions emerged by investing on this basic weak spot in our perception. Conspiracies are a convenient scapegoat narrative. If some of them eventually turn out to be falling along our narrative, it is nothing but a statistical variation. Perhaps the most interesting fact about conspiracy theories is the way they tend to go viral within specific groups of people, remembering the ones that somewhat happened while avoiding the ones that were completely off. Truth is never black and white but rather innumerable shades of gray. This goes against the very core of conspiracy theories that depend on polar opposites in order to sell—and dogmatism is exactly what tends to be propagated one way or another inside their circles.





For example, there is a massive anti-chemo movement claiming that chemotherapy for cancer treatment is not only useless but lethal. So far we don’t know much about the workings of cancer. We do have evidence that chemo is the best chance a cancer patient can have for prolonging their life for most cases of cancer. When some chemotherapy treatments don’t work, desperate patients seek alternatives and the opposing market, the “naturalists”, are there to sell them just about anything and claim any potential lucky "survival statistics". The post-hoc narrative along with the inability to properly evaluate survival rates creates a conspiracy fairy tale that most people are ready to accept because supericially it makes sense. Indeed there are thousands who swear that they got cured because of alternative medical treatments. Thing is, we never hear the opinion of those who are dead.

Narratives provide a simple story that is understandable, easy to digest and can be easily propagated from mouth to mouth. The evidence most conspiracy theories provide are pedantic on the level of “Politician X was dining with businessman Y”. That’s all the evidence the average folk needs and really can have access to. A vague correlation for a frustrated citizen is often more than enough.

If we wish to break it down even more, most conspiracies are really based on a “paranoid boyfriend” mentality. For example, an insecure boyfriend catches his girlfriend chatting with a random guy. He calls her a whore because of a vague correlation without having further evidence. Conspiracy theorists tend to do the same and even worse when it comes to corporate businesses or governments. The worst part? We get our information from those whom we accuse of defrauding us which doesn't make much sense in believing it. Sure, some conspiracy theories do play out along the lines of our overgeneralised narrative but those are not really conspiracies to begin with. It was not such a big secret for example that NSA was eavesdropping. More or less that could be deducted when they made it clear about "fighting terrorism" or even from simple observations what network administrators do in most companies. Same applies to politicians defrauding the system as revealed from wikileaks. They are politicians. It’s their job to defraud people. No surprise there either for those who understand a thing or two about politics. Most conspiracies are nothing more but the end result of something gone terribly bad from incompetent bureaucratic governments. One would have thought that libertarians and anarchists would be immune to conspiracy theories since they acknowledge how tragic the governmental structures are. I mean, come on. How a useless entity such as "the government" can really orchestrate so massively elabrate plans when they can barely run anything on a smaller scale?





What becomes evident in detailed investigations such as in the case of the housing market collapse or even in war declarations is that nobody really knows what is going on. Often one harsh decision leads to another without the parties involved even realizing how things unfolded they way they did. A great example of this is WW1. A simple incident that everybody expected to end in a couple of months became one of the biggest bloodsheds in human history. Post-hoc we came to give our own narrative about how all events played-out as described from those who won the war—supposedly even controlling our lives today. In the Housing Market Crash, people ended up accusing the big banks and the guys of Wall Street that shorted toxic investments through credit default swaps. Nobody dared to think the obvious explanation—irresponsible masses purchased things with money they didn’t have and ended up paying even more for their irresponsibility. We are raised to believe that we are helpless little babies that need to be taken by the hand. If something goes wrong is the fault of the corporation, the banker, the government, the parent—never us. A 40-second dialogue from the movie Margin Call between two investment bankers answers to those who still insist about this pedantic excuse.
 


 
Deep inside, we suspect that the world is not governed by anyone. We seek control because we are teleological beings bound by cause and effect. We are desperate to know the aetiology of things; why are we here, who made us and where we are going. Throughout the ages we created elaborate stories to explain our sufferings. Stories became religions, political narratives, history, myths. Today most people don’t even read basic historical or scientific books thus much of reality manifests through movies or tv-series. We have become more elaborate with our narrative but we still lie to ourselves much the same. I can’t count the amount of times I have seen on the trending page of Steemit themes from popular series, video games or fiction books. We rarely realise how much trash we absorb and how through our cognitive biases we falsely construct our reality. It becomes a giant circle of paranoia and the only thing we have is our own reassurance.

The greatest conspiracy is our own existence. We are at the center of it all; reaffirming illusions to nourish our deepest insecurities. Although chaos and randomness define us, we refuse to accept them as the de-facto state of the world. Sure, reality is sometimes too much to digest but this is not an excuse for running away from it. The scariest part of our world is not that some people are in control. This line of reasoning is rather a comforting narrative. The raw truth is that nobody is in charge.







Sort:  

The only thing separating a lot of conspiracies ("theory") from (being regarded as) history is the time-space coordinates in which they are publicly acknowledged. I mean, things that have happened, of a conspiratory nature, are rarely disclosed in real time. But they can be found out or disclosed later.

The thing is one must have discernment to say what has substance, and what doesn't, and do so in real-time, when there is a lack of factual evidence. There is a lot of calculated guesswork going on there, but one can't assume the official storyline is the right one. When governments, big corporations, etc etc, have good reason to conceal the truth, they often do. And it's up to the people to find the truth. Some will accept the mainstream story, some won't, some will guess right, some won't.

Ask yourself alexgr

Even in real life events, whether it comes to personal relationships or even business do we ever disclose all the details of our affairs? Are we perfectly honest and open with everything? Ofcourse not. We hide some of our cards.

Why should the government or politicians expected to be completely open when their stake are much higher? I mean what kind of double standards do we have? Also like I aforementioned; If they are indeed so big and powerful why assume we know anything? We might as well follow breadcrumps, end up knowing exactly what they want us to know. Why would you assume that some random info from some shady website somehow reveals the truth to us? Those guys have been proven over and over again that they sell snake oil if anything and people desperate buy their crap because they distrust the alternative sources much more.

Everything is about marketing, even the ones saying that they supply us with the truth. Marketing demands secrecy. That does not make something a "conspiracy".

I view both info and disinfo as the catalyst that elevate human discernment. Without all this sea of misinformation (whether the misinformation masquerades as "official stories", or "alternative stories") it would be impossible for humanity to develop discernment.

Obviously those who are thought-clients, meaning they want someone else (whether it is a website, an "official", or some kind of presenter) to tell them what is true and what isn't, will never be properly catalyzed. They are like ...well, "clients", entering various "shops" and choosing to "buy" whatever truth they find to be more of their preference.

I believe if one structures their life along the lines of "everything is chaotic" is better off rather than trying to piece the strings of innumerable instances.

At the end the whole thing is nothing more than hubris to human intelligence. We often witness optical illusions and cannot even believe our own eyes. Considering the possibility that we can know things transfered to us through a narrative is ludicrous. Even in science we often see how a simple title in a scientific paper can be interpeted in so many different ways and we all have access to that same paper.

Imagine what happens when we add thousands of events in a situation that nobody really saw the whole thing.

Random events followed by stupid reactions and opportunism have probably shaped history more than conspiracies and careful planning. Conspiracy theories, bad history books and Hollywood create a seemingly logical and coherent story afterwards, and the story holds, because it is easier to accept than the chaos, incompetence and opportunism that really shaped events. Looking at original historical documents I have often found the top-level players asking each other "Now what do we do?" at several points in time, where some history books describe the smooth execution of a pre-made, well-thought-out plan.

Random events followed by stupid reactions and opportunism have probably shaped history more than conspiracies and careful planning.

Most definatly. Look at 95% of science. all accidents instead of intentional research.

Politicians, corporations, the Pope, anyone famous, become effigies of demons. They're so distanced from the millions of average people that conceptualizing them as non-human easily spreads en masse. It's no different than the manipulation the Nazis did to inspire social change (nice way to put it, right?) They made common enemies for people to spark their revolution. They made the enemies into 'subhumans' to make them acceptable targets for human aggressions.

Plus, people love a good underdog story. Some people look at those of status and wealth vs. everyday folk like the noble underdog vs. those 'corrupted' by power.

Being a conspiracy theorist is like interpretting a certain social-philosophical movie completely literally. Then tell themselves they're the only ones who 'get it,' They're not enlightened. They're uninsightful.


Real truth is always buried deeper...in layers of symbolism.

Each time a person comments "lluminati", a fairy dies.

Illuminati^2 :)

Oh my god, think of the fairies!

Well, if it ain't a conspiracy then it's a coinkeedink....

I suspect this post is a CIA press release :)

Either that, or a scam!

Yeah, this post is a

scam

I wouldn't go that far now, unless.... Yeah, errm @block1

hmmm, nah.. Coinkeedink....

Resteemed :)

I love your sense of humor @majes!

(that was supposed to be funny, right?)

Yes, I actually conspired with some of my peeps on it....

I prefer piracy with cons, which is why I got into conspiracy in the first place.

Did you notice the fake crop circle ?

Pretty sure it's fake, it's not even a circle....

So crop circles are just like the moon landing and Paul McCartney?

It hard to go on some days...

Conspiracy theorising is perfectly natural to the human mind. In fact its just a sub folder of theorising. We do it for all sorts, what going to happen in "X " show, whos going to win "X", whos seeing who at work. So its only natural big events should be subject to it. And its not just individuals groups do it as well, oh its demons doing that, or the Russians doing this. Its all part of being human, trying to work out what everyone else's angle is. Nwo, religion,aliens, hollow earth, flat earth, so on and so on is the more extreme end of the stick but it does make for some cool story's. But i would argue cause and effect play a greater part than chaos and randomness.

In history and politics, there is little cause and effect or planning linking the two. Events rarely cause anything, it takes a benevolent, or incompetent, or, very often, opportunistic actor for the events to have any effect at all. The Helvetians' relocating didn't cause anything more than some local uneasiness, it took an opportunistic and indebted Caesar to use it as an opportune excuse to invade and subdue Gaul and make some cash. The Helvetians' moving house can't be said to have been the cause of the Gallic Wars, it was just an event somebody took advantage of. WWI wasn't caused by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, but by the incompetent, panicky and opportunistic reactions of several state leaders, one of whom was slightly potty. WWI could easily have been prevented at that point, the supposed cause of WWI by itself caused nothing but the death of Franz Ferdinand. The so-called causes are often nothing but random events without much effect until somebody somewhere decides to act upon them in some way, which is why you can't predict the effects causes have; the presence or absence of an opportunistic actor is also a random factor, as are their intentions. There are no automatic chains of events, it is not physics.

These things may appear random, but all are effects of an cause. Using your examples Helvetians first had been joined by the Tigurini who had been raiding roman provinces not painting them in the best light. Caesar also tried to stop them moving , the Helvetians went on to attack the Aedui who ask for Caesars help and got it. So it went on , cause, effect, cause. Nothing random.
The Archduke and WW1 conspiracy and high political/economic intrigue abound on those chapters. Far far too many players involved to be simple chance. Even the flat tire on your car is not random, a chain of events must have happened to reach that outcome. Unpredictable yes,probability clouds yes. There is a whole other discussion if random even exists. As Einstein said "God does not play dice".

Also it is undeniable that people plan illegal things. And others try guess what happened or is to happen.

Note that for some of the supposed cause-and-effect relations we only have Caesars word from his post-hoc book justifying himself to the Senate.

"Randomness is the property of lacking any sensible predictability" is the definition I use. Ex-post explanations and supposed cause-and-effect relations found after the event don't make the events less random. Maybe it is in the definition of randomness where we disagree.

As to Einstein: he was referring to quantum mechanics, and he was probably wrong. Bad pun.

"Maybe it is in the definition of randomness where we disagree." agreed =) . "he was probably wrong" lol

Keep working, stop paying.

Reminds me of this great video by Tim Minchin called "Storm" with this gem of a line: "You know what they call natural medicine that works? Medicine."

You may be surprised to know you and I have similar views on many things. My last post on genetics, pokemon go, and the myth of equal opportunity touches on some of these same stories we tell ourselves in order to function and try to make the world "fair" when it really isn't.