The part concerning John's sentencing just makes me sick. There is such a false equivalence how being in a major authoritative position means you are "qualified" for the job. Average people think this, they even put their trust in these figures to make the right choices. The judge in this case obviously had a huge ego if she made such a statement concerning sentencing John to the max sentence, even though John went through lawful process for his plea deal. The judge also did not understand what he actually did (or cared). She was probably also told how to rule this one too, though. A prime and blatant example of injustice being served.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: