Lots of people look at the moon landing pictures and videos arguing about inconsistencies they discovered and the opposite camp discrediting the skeptics with "real science" and how their observations are childish and immature pure conspiracy attention grabs.
Some people debate over cross hairs on the pictures, shadows, rocks at wrong places, movements not moon-like, flag waiving without atmosphere and a lot more direct evidence.
For me there are indirect factors that speak volumes, much more than every other particular detail combined. Now, that we try to "repeat" what has been presumably done already, how come:
All drawings, blueprints and other documentation of presumably the most ambitious human program on earth just disappeared? And it wasn't an amateur back yard lab from where it's gone. It was stored at top secret government facilities and very carefully guarded. We are certainly fooled about something here.
Even if everything is gone, there were still people alive who presumably created it. They would be able to help to recreate the most critical know-how and the rest of small details can be easily filled in by modern day engineers.
If "we did it" in 1969 how come 50 years later we cannot simply recreate technology of 1950th? Seriously? Even if everything existed but was lost, indeed? Just look at the cars made in 1950th and 60th. Compare to today's tech. Look at the airplanes and compare. Another example that I like is if there was a computer hardware and software built in 1960th and some software was lost and we are claiming that today with modern computers and AI and software we can't make the same computations that we made in 1960th. How much sense does it make?
We still cannot overcome the hurdle of how to make a human to pass Van Allen radiation belts and stay alive. But we presumably did in 1960th! So are we told that there was nobody alive anymore for decades sonde it happened who would know how we did that even if some documentation was lost?
When I ask these questions I don't even need to get into nitty gritty of the debate about some cross hairs on some photos. I look at the big picture. The answer for me is very clear in simple common sense.