Not in support of the soft fork doesn't necessarily mean one's in support of what JSun did. Don't mistake the two of them.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Not in support of the soft fork doesn't necessarily mean one's in support of what JSun did. Don't mistake the two of them.
Good point, my fault there :)
Anyway, (in my opinion) seeing what JS did validated entirely the need of the Soft Fork. The takeover it's the proof which shows that the elected witnesses we're correct.
Greetings and have a good day.
Thank you.
Have a great day, @empoderat.