Look at what happened to Dan. He made a decentralized platform and that got pushed off of his own creation... TWICE! If a project becomes centralized around more trustworthy people than decentralization can offer... then it's obviously a superior system.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Dear @edicted
Thank you for your kind reply.
I absolutely don't know how did things play out with Dan (behind scenes). All I know is that he moved on and STEEM was just another step in his amazing career.
I also wanted to make some suggestion.
My impression is, that the hardest part of attracting attention on STEEMIT is the fact, that our audience have very little chance to actually find our publications. Lack of solid notification system is an obvious issue. And regardless how hard I would try - there is very little chance I would find out about your new interesting publications (my feed is just flooded with to many posts).
Please allow me to share some suggestion with you. If you would ever publish content related to blockchain, crypto, artificial intelligence, psychology etc.
then perhaps you could simply send me memo with link to that post.This way not only I would have a chance to read your publication, but I will also
upvote it right away with 20k SP voting power. If I would consider it interesting then I may also share it with wider audience.Please let me know what do you think.
Cheers, Piotr
If we are talking from the perspective of upvote rewards then we are in agreement. However as far as the search engines go we can be all equal. Try the search "novacadian cookies" in DuckDuckGo. 😎