Your body is one of the most complex structures in the universe. It consists of about 100 billion cellular cells, blood cells, brain cells , eye cells, a leg, muscle cells and red blood cells. There are more than 200 different types of cells in your body.
Brain Cells
Blood cells
Eye cell's
leg, muscle cells
Although your cells are different in terms of form and function, they still make a complex network.
The Internet, with all its millions of computers and high-speed data cables, is clumsy in comparison to that.
No human invention comes even close to the technical brilliance that can be seen in even the simplest cells.
How did the cells originate from which the human body was composed ?
Scientists claim that all living cells fall into one of two main categories - those with a core and those without a core. The cells of humans, animals and plants have a core. Bacterial cells do not have. Those without a core are known as prokaryotes and those with a core are eukaryotic.
Many believe that the cells of animals and plants should have evolved from bacterial cells.
Many even say that some "simple" prokaryotic cells swallowed other cells for millions of years, but did not consume them.
What does the Bible say? The Bible says that life on earth is the product of intelligence. Notice the Bible's clear logic: "For every house is built by someone, but He who built all things is God."
Hebrews 3:4 NKJV
http://bible.com/114/heb.3.4.NKJV
" Another Bible section says, " O Lord , how manifold are Your works! In wisdom You have made them all. The earth is full of Your possessions— This great and wide sea, In which are innumerable teeming things, Living things both small and great.
Psalms 104:24-25 NKJV
http://bible.com/114/psa.104.24-25.NKJV
Could even a "simple" cell really come from lifeless chemical substances? (big bang)
If the theory of evolution is true, it must provide a plausible explanation for the way in which the first "simple" cell occurred. If life has been created, even in the smallest creatures there must be evidence of inventive design.
Take a look at these pictures and asks yourself if you believe that such a cell could happen by chance.
Evolution scientists speculated that the first living cells should look more or less like these cells above. Let me know what you think in the comments.
Thank you for reading, be blessed!
@scotty777
Time is such a big factor as possibilities are endless. But in the end out intellectual capacity to grasp the gravity, or universe of what is in the grand scheme of things is just endless in itself. But science helps us to ask better questions, observe in a different light. I myself have an agnostic point of view that there is a divine, but at the same time i'm skeptical as i believe we humans aren't the only beings around here. Doctrine and scholars can really be misinterpreted or used to fuel ignorance.
Nevertheless, we are at little, beautifully complex as an organism. I will always seek out to understand consciousness. Religion is one with you and God. Thank you for your post.
Respectfully, yes, I do believe it happened by chance. 3.5 billion years, combined the fact that radiation causes strange things to happen.
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=47820
Have you considered all the types of genetic disorders? These are random and can be caused by physical exposure. For example, smoking while pregnant, diseases from mosquitos, drinking while pregnant. So genes can be changed by physical substances.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genetic_disorders
So genes do get modified in abnormal ways. And in addition to that, human now are determining how to modify them. Look at these glow-in-the-dark cats.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/jellyfish-genes-make-glow-in-the-dark-cats/
So, here's my point.
Radiation causes strange things to happen in cells. Physical chemicals cause genes to change. These changes can cause things like glow-in-the-dark cats.
Now, if suddenly glow-in-the-dark cats survived better than not-glow-in-the-dark cats for some reason, then we would expect to only find glow-in-the-dark cats. Only the strong survive. This is called natural selection.
Not that this will matter because the poster believes in God and there is no way to logically argue with a religious person;
But It's all to do with the nature of Infinity, because the universe is so old it is more likely than not that life would have developed over that time, Basically to analogize; "A much less likely scenario would be an untrained monkey, or lets say something that randomly generates letters/words would be able to form the complete work of Shakespeare, However given Infinite time this Would Happen" So basically if given a large amount of time, intricate culminations can form from seemingly "Random" or even completely random processes, this is to say that it is absolutely possible, in fact more possible than not possible (In terms of Entropy) that due to the age of the universe that the "Seemingly Random" Processes of atoms would form complex molecules and these molecules would form structures like Protozoa, Bacteria, etc. Which again over time would evolve into (Through random or seemingly random processes) multi cellular organisms like plants, animals.
Thank you for reading and commenting @iceshaft07. Sorry don't know why but I can't get the reply directly under your comment! My goal with my posts is not to prove what non-believing scientist believe is wrong but to bring honor to my Creator God for everything He made so wonderful.
Thank you for taking the time to read and comment. Obviously our viewpoint and beliefs differs. As you said you can't argue logically with a Christian, I feel the same a non-believer will never agrees with me. My goal with this series of posts is not to necessarily prove that what unbelieving scientist say is wrong but to bring honor to God for what He created.
Not to mention that we are speaking about millions of years, it is a huge amount of time, unimaginable for us what can happen in such a big interval.
There are more unexplained things in this world than the things that we can explain, but it does not allow us to close the gaps with whatever supernatural explanation we prefer to believe in.
I beg to differ and I don't quite understand as my mother tongue is not english but it seems to me that the above is an insult to God.
More precisely, it is a critique of the idea of explanations of the natural world coming from a supernatural source. Premature sobrenaturalism is a fallacy.
Begging to differ with Mr. Degrasse and his brethren, but the more one finds out the more one discovers it could not all have been an accident, statement is based much more on desire for it to be so than credible evidence.
@Wilx thank you for the time to read and for your comments. I totally agree with you, thanks for the back-up. Blessings!
The scientists disagree with the necessity of the supernatural to explain the natural world. And no wonder most of them do not believe in the supernatural.
For science the world is naturalistic, until proven otherwise.
That is the problem with most scientists, logical conclusions are dismissed because they can't see it with their eyes.. yet believe a fairy tale of beyond astronomical odds can actually occur.
The natural world and the factual truth does not have to agree with human logic.T Logic alone is not enough to say if something is a scientific truth. That is why we need to make experiments, to see if the theoretical conclusions agree with what is objectively observed in the factual world.
I agree and many actual scientists agree as well, there is no way life could have evolved by chance not even in 5 Billion years, there is just too much complexity in cellular structures.
Sure, radiation can cause disruptions in a complex structure but it cannot built that very same complex structure by pure chance.
Chance would be against all odds.
Thanks for your great comment
It is easier for me to think what was written, And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground and breathed into is nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul. Genesis 2:7
The big bang is to get the masses from thinking away from God. The big bang also makes masses forget about the firmament. If we really understand what is above it, what is in it and what is below it then we can understand Psalm 19:1
Wernher von Braun of NASA couldn't say anything about it while he was alive, but at his death he left a clue to the world with Psalm 19:1 on his grave marker. He wanted people to look into the firmament.
Great comment, thank you @david777111
Congratulations @scotty777! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPSecondarily, I look forward to responding to your future posts. I think we can build quite the following by disagreeing with eachother.
Good :-) watch for my future post!
I thought those were balloons.
haha no not balloons. cells. Thank you for taking the time to read and comment.
Excellent article @scotty777!!!
Congratulations on your win in the Christian-Trail Featured Post Contest!!!
Because of changes recently made to the Upvote booster, articles that are more than 4 days old are not being upvoted.
So your win will be sent directly to you in SDB's
Excellent article, very well put together and informative, and the pictures are amazing!
This post received a 4.2% upvote from @randowhale thanks to @livingwaters! For more information, click here!