Great post. I was having a similar conversation with someone the other day. In comparison with what we see and are not capable of seeing the knowledge we have gained through scientific means is nothing more than a speck of dust. So it is not right to say science answers all the questions or can be the moral arbiter of society as some present day philosophers like to argue.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thank you @codero, I agree completely. There are particles that are even smaller than atoms that science doesn't have the technology to physically see. So until they are viewed, they are "theories." And science definitely isn't the moral arbiter of society. Many find that DNA manipulation is far from moral.
Thank you for reading and responding.