What example is that?
There's no such thing as "playing neutral" when you are actually voting.
Do you go to the political ballet and vote each parties equally and call them a "neutral" vote?
Even in the US, a "neutral" vote wouldn't be voting for both Democrats and Republicans.
FFS man.
Never said neutral.
What i said was that they disagreed with witness, but also didn't fully supported Justin.
The whole problem i see is that they were excluded because they didn't fully support the old witness (before or after the take over, doesnt matter).
So this works like blaming the voter instead of fixing the problem(wich is still adjusting the system to not allow this to happen again).
May want to revisit his stance on the matter. A few of them likes to use the "balance" nonsense.
That equates to support. End of discussion.