While most indie media was focused on debating the way people talk about Kanye West and the disappearance of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, an unprecedented escalation in internet censorship took place which threatens everything we all care about. It received frighteningly little attention.
After a massive purge of hundreds of politically oriented pages and personal accounts for "inauthentic behavior", Facebook rightly received a fair amount of criticism for the nebulous and hotly disputed basis for that action. What received relatively little attention was the far more ominous step which was taken next: within hours of being purged from Facebook, multiple anti-establishment alternative media sites had their accounts completely removed from Twitter as well.
As of this writing I am aware of three large alternative media outlets which were expelled from both platforms at almost the same time: Anti-Media, the Free Thought Project, and Police the Police, all of whom had millions of followers on Facebook. Both the Editor-in-Chief of Anti-Media and its Chief Creative Officer were also banned by Twitter, and are being kept from having any new accounts on that site as well.
"I unfortunately always felt the day would come when alternative media would be scrubbed from major social media sites," Anti-Media's Chief Creative Officer S.M. Gibson said in a statement to me. "Because of that I prepared by having backup accounts years ago. The fact that those accounts, as well as 3 accounts from individuals associated with Anti-Media were banned without warning and without any reason offered by either platform makes me believe this purge was certainly orchestrated by someone. Who that is I have no idea, but this attack on information was much more concise and methodical in silencing truth than most realize or is being reported."
It is now clear that there is either (A) some degree of communication/coordination between Twitter and Facebook about their respective censorship practices, or (B) information being given to both Twitter and Facebook by another party regarding targets for censorship. Either way, it means that there is now some some mechanism in place linking the censorship of dissident voices across multiple platforms. We are beginning to see smaller anti-establishment alternative media outlets cut off from their audiences by the same sort of coordinated cross-platform silencing we first witnessed with Alex Jones in August.
This is about as acute a threat to our ability to network and share information with each other as anything you could possibly imagine. If new media outlets are beginning to silence dissident voices together in unison, that means we can see entire alternative media outlets not just partially silenced but thoroughly silenced, their ability to grow their audiences and get information out to heavily populated parts of the internet completely crippled.
This is huge, this is dangerous, and this is being under-reported. When I was removed from Twitter in August for "abusing" John McCain, there was a large and outraged uproar on Twitter, and my account was quickly restored with an apology. And I'm really grateful for that, but the phenomenon of multiple high-profile alternative media outlets suddenly being silenced in unison by the two biggest social media platforms should be generating more outrage than some ornery Australian blogger losing her Twitter account, not less. This should be the top story in alternative media, because it affects us all.
Any time you try to talk about how internet censorship threatens our ability to get the jackboot of oligarchy off our necks you'll always get some guy in your face who's read one Ayn Rand book and thinks he knows everything, saying things like "Facebook is a private company! It can do whatever it wants!" Is it now? Has not Facebook been inviting US government-funded groups to help regulate its operations, vowing on the Senate floor to do more to facilitate the interests of the US government, deleting accounts at the direction of the US and Israeli governments, and handing the guidance of its censorship behavior over to the Atlantic Council, which receives funding from the US government, the EU, NATO and Gulf states? How "private" is that? Facebook is a deeply government-entrenched corporation, and Facebook censorship is just what government censorship looks like in a corporatist system of government.
Speaking of the Atlantic Council, it recently published a very interesting 21-page document about a US military conference detailing, in present tense, how Silicon Valley tech giants are being used to nullify the threat that the new media landscape poses to the US power establishment.
Of this document, World Socialist Website writes the following:
Enter the social media companies. The best mechanism for suppressing oppositional viewpoints and promoting pro-government narratives is the private sector, in particular “technology giants, including Facebook, Google, YouTube, and Twitter,” which can “determine what people see and do not see.”
Watts adds, “Fortunately, shifts in the policies of social media platforms such as Facebook have had significant impact on the type and quality of the content that is broadcast.”
The private sector, therefore, must do the dirty work of the government, because government propaganda is viewed with suspicion by the population. “Business and the private sector may not naturally understand the role they play in combating disinformation, but theirs is one of the most important…. In the West at least, they have been thrust into a central role due to the general public’s increased trust in them as institutions.”
The best way to deal with a manipulative sociopath is to point and make a lot of noise every time they do something weird and creepy. The more you let them abuse you in private, the more they can rope you in and get you playing along with their sick agendas. If you notice them doing something weird, the best way to nullify all the tools in their wicked little toolbox is to point and yell "Hey! What are you doing?? Why are you doing that? That's weird!" Get people looking, because such beasts can't advance their manipulations with a lot of critical eyes on them.
Propaganda and censorship operates very much the same way. If you are unfamiliar with the concept of the Streisand effect, I encourage you to begin to acquaint yourself with it. Named for an incident in which Barbra Streisand attempted to suppress online photographs of her Malibu residence and thereby inadvertently drew far more attention to them, the Streisand effect describes the way attempts to hide and censor information can be used to draw more attention to it if the coverup attracts the interest of the public eye. Every censor needs to prevent this from happening in order to do their job effectively; if it looks like removing something from public view would draw more attention to it, then they cannot practice censorship in that case.
So let's Streisand this thing up, hey? Let's make a big angry noise about this new cross-platform escalation in internet censorship, and let's make a big angry noise any time anyone makes a move to silence dissident political speech in the new media environment. Manipulators can only function in darkness, so let's never give them any. Anything they try, we need to make a ton of noise about it. That by itself would be throwing an enormous stumbling block in their path while we find new ways to clear a path for more and more networking and information sharing. These bastards have controlled the narrative for too long.
Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal,buying my new book Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone, or my previous book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
Excellent post Caitlin. Thanks for highlighting that the apparent collusion between the social media giants shows an obvious well-coordinated effort on their part. Dare I mention it, but they appear to have "conspired". This is indeed quite worrying and of course the mainstream media is silent on the subject and its relation to free speech in the age of Internet social media giants and corporate (gov't affiliated) censorship.
I collated a number of Twitter posts, including a few of yours, that highlight who was affected and how this was carried out. Hope you don't mind me sharing it for your discerning audience. Best regards.
Huge Facebook Censorship Purge Enacted As Atlantic Council/NATO Partnered Social Media Giant Removes Over 800 Alternative Media Accounts
https://steemit.com/news/@clarityofsignal/huge-facebook-censorship-purge-enacted-as-atlantic-council-nato-partnered-social-media-giant-removes-over-800-alternative-media
My Twitter and Facebook accounts were wiped in 2016. Though I wrote about it a lot, nobody cared. Nobody did a thing. Now the bigger accounts are getting it. Thanks for coming on board, Caitlin. This has been happening for years.
Social media? More like social masturbation.
It is the approximation of social interaction, but without voice, visuals or meaningful text, it is nothing more than a facsimile of interaction. It is social masturbation. Seeking, scrolling, and strategizing about who you talk with and what you say.
It's going down. I just recently moved from FB in earnest for my business and social scene. I think it is contagious.
The idea of people thinking that Social Masturbation sites would allow dissidents to stand up and foment real revolution is completely naive of our current reality.
FB and Twitter will allow the appearance of revolution, but not revolution itself. Mass bannings were a given, IMO.
Since facebook and twitter are both kowtowing to the government, then they all should be held accountable to the people. But that doesn't happen in a kakistocracy
I have tried to outcry on Facebook but none of my friends or family are even responding to it. No idea of any onfo about that is shadow-banned or if people are generally super desinterested in that.
You've been shadow-banned. I post a picture of my kids and get 3 likes. Two years ago I'd get 100. I have more friends, but very very few of them see anything I post.
I can still comment on their posts though ;)
In the words of Abby Martin, it's now "weapons of mass distraction"
Perhaps check out Mouthy Buddha's latest vid. on China's Social Credit.
I would say that is the macro issue here and the micro issue is to influence mid-term voting to favor the corporate Dems. (is there any other kind?) who would definitely want a Social Credit System to protect their profits and to ensure consumers have 'the right attitude'...
I wonder if the investors of these platforms will take legal action as some kind of mismanagement (or something).
When ideology reduces business profit (share price), there must be some accountability...
I just read this article via Zero Hedge. I'm glad to see that you are posting on Steemit. Censorship resistant blockchain social media is the future.
Great post - Resteemed!
I have covered this in great depth and am in the process of mounting a Steem powered response to it all.
The zionist scum have fully got this one in hand - they own all the main social propaganda sites -the big question is what are they really up to? - they are fully smart enough to know this will piss people off, so what is the deeper agenda?