I often find the Rare articles informative, so I wanted to share one here: http://rare.us/rare-politics/rare-liberty/rand-paul-america-should-reject-the-false-appeal-of-socialism/
Let me know what you think.
I often find the Rare articles informative, so I wanted to share one here: http://rare.us/rare-politics/rare-liberty/rand-paul-america-should-reject-the-false-appeal-of-socialism/
Let me know what you think.
socialism is where the workers control the means of production.
I looked for the tenets of socialism: This seems to be a good source on it. http://money.howstuffworks.com/socialism1.htm
that's pure propaganda.
Why don't you read a book that was, I don't know, made by a socialist?
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-syndicalism
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/rudolf-rocker-anarchosyndicalism
The "State" is simply a majority rule.
It looks to me that it is the government that controls the means of production in socialism.
really? That's called propaganda, ever heard of it? Unless the people directly control the government, then its not under the definition of socialism.
remember revolutionary Spain, anarchist Ukraine? Even the USSR ran majority on elected local councils, even the big council that ran the military and other national stuff was elected, unlike the """""democracy""""" in the united states.
So you are saying that the howstuffworks article is propaganda?
"dispel class distinctions by turning over control of industry to the state."
propaganda or stupid. The goal is to create a dictatorship of the proletariat, in other words majority rule. This can have a "government", although it is very different from one under capitalism. In fact in state socialism it starts fading away immediately. Then other branches understand a state isn't even needed.
Either way, the state is literally the people of the society and not an oppressive mass like you make it out to be, well that's what it is under socialism anyway. I am an anarchist, but unlike you I understand the nature of states.
Also the "turning it over to the state" part is very incorrect. The people labouring on it manage it, and the state arises out of that. Not the other way around.
I read the wikipedia article on Anarcho-syndicalism. It seems to me that the idea is rationalized theft, because the majority wants something that a minority has.
has? No, they only control it. Anarchist syndicalism is simply the workers taking control of what they have always used and keeping what they produce, instead of allowing it to be stolen by the rich who do no labor themselves but somehow "own" (control) the products the working class creates.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/wage-labour/
This explains the nature of the control.
Congratulations @grwduck! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCongratulations @grwduck! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP